Canadian Shakespeare News


Updated CFP: Outerspeares

Outerspeares: Transcultural / Transmedia Adaptations of Shakespeare

The 1st Annual Conference of the Guelph Early Modern Studies Group
University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario – November 1, 2011

Contact email: gems@uoguelph.ca

Deadline for Proposals: May 1, 2011

Description:

Our globalized, digitized textual environment has truly become, in Shakespearean terms, a “brave new world” of virtual realities, post-/trans- national identities, and unprecedented constructs of communication and meaning that shapeshift transculturally across different media. Ania Loomba suggests that “emerging national/imperial identities in Europe could never be entirely pure, could never successfully erase the long histories of intermingling.” In our contemporary globalized and digitized media environment, the concept of “intermingling” speaks not only to our distant past but also to our sense of our post-national and increasingly virtual future.

As conceptions of the world have changed, so has Shakespeare accommodated new attitudes to culture, cultural negotiations, and emerging forms of human expression. Shakespeare’s continual, pervasive adaptation across an array of cultural contexts and media platforms forces consideration of the ways meaning is assigned to literary texts, and how meaning is located in the particulars of these cultural events. Transcultural, Intercultural, Multicultural and cross-, mixed-, or transmedia adaptations of Shakespeare reconfigure the relationship between textual autonomy and historical particulars, pushing beyond conventional understandings of the literary event and the complexities of historical time.

This conference explores transcultural and transmedia adaptations of Shakespeare and the Shakespeare effect through a variety of interdisciplinary perspectives, welcoming papers that address the transcultural and/or transdisciplinary aspects of Shakespeare in the contemporary world. Outerspeares focuses on the radical reshaping that multiple forms of media sampling engage to produce new forms of knowledge associated with “wild Shakespeare,” a form of anarchic “engagement with prior texts that cannot be policed and refuses containment.”

Keynote Speakers:

The keynote speaker on transcultural Shakespeares at the conference will be Tom Magill, Director of “Mickey B,” The Educational Shakespeare Company’s innovative adaptation of Macbeth featuring prisoners from Belfast’s Maghaberry Prison, who will screen the film and give a plenary talk. Click here for more information on the film.

The keynote speakers on transmedia Shakespeares at the conference will be Anthony Del Col and Connor McCreery, creators of the Kill Shakespeare graphic novel series, soon to be mediated into a major motion picture. Please see the following link for more information on Kill Shakespeare: http://www.killshakespeare.com/press.html.

Papers on the following topics are of particular interest:

• Transcultural adaptations of Shakespeare across media platforms (Film, Television, Visual Art, Performance Art, and the like)
• Transmedia Shakespeares with a focus on how Shakespeare has been sampled, appropriated, and transformed in and across a variety of new and old media
• Theorizing the transculturation of Shakespeare
• Shakespeare and the transculturalism of the Global Early Modern Period
• Shakespeare and Media Subcultures (Graphic Novel subcultures, Film Subcultures, etc.)
• Shakespeare and Diaspora
• Any other topic that falls within the conference theme.

Contact:

Send a (maximum)one-page Abstract to the conference organizers at gems@uoguelph.ca.
Please note any audio/visual equipment required. For more information, use the above contact or visit our conference website, http://gemsconference.blogspot.com.

Conference organizers strongly encourage graduate students to submit proposals. Conference organizers plan to produce a book based on conference proceedings.


Family Ties Strengthen Authenticity of Shakespeare Portrait: News Release

Below is an extended version of the University of Guelph news release, Family Ties Strengthen Authenticity of Shakespeare Portrait (17 March 2011), which summarizes the latest genealogical research undertaken by Daniel Fischlin, Pam Hinks, and Lloyd Sullivan in relation to the Sanders portrait of Shakespeare:

A University of Guelph professor has helped reveal family connections between William Shakespeare and direct ancestors of the Ottawa owner of a portrait of the Bard thought to be the only one painted while he was alive.

This latest research discovery, which unveils ongoing relations between the two families over several centuries, adds to the substantial body of evidence for the painting’s authenticity.

Known as the Sanders portrait, the painting is thought to depict the Bard at age 39 and is owned by Lloyd Sullivan, a friend and supporter of the University of Guelph. It’s thought that Shakespeare sat for an ancestor of Sullivan’s (whose mother was Kathleen Hale Sanders) and that the portrait has been passed down through his mother’s family over the past 400 years.

Thirteen previous forensic tests have already confirmed that the painting dates from around 1600 and has not been altered since. And the latest genealogical research combined with the successful scientific tests carried out on the Sanders portrait, conclusively support the Sanders’ family claim that their ancestors were related to Shakespeare through affinity and would have known him intimately.

At a time of severe persecution of Catholics by Queen Elizabeth I through her vast network of spies and informants especially in the Midlands of England (Shakespeare’s country, especially Worcestershire and Warwickshire), close family ties to Shakespeare would have been paramount in gaining his trust, confidence and consent to paint his portrait and to record personal details of his life on the label affixed to the back of the Sanders portrait.

English professor and University Research Chair Daniel Fischlin, along with Sullivan and British genealogist Pamela Hinks, have spent seven years researching the connection between Sullivan’s ancestors the Sanders family and Shakespeare’s family in order to further substantiate the story.

“The weight of evidence supporting the authenticity of this painting is now overwhelming,” said Fischlin, who was involved in researching the social, historical and cultural context required to interpret the genealogy of the two families. “We embarked on this journey to find the truth. It comes down to wanting to give accurate shape to a very rich story and respecting the historical details surrounding one of the most important figures in Western culture. All too often this sort of history gets treated as a dead artifact, when in fact living people nowhere near as famous as Shakespeare with fascinating, complex lives that were interconnected in remarkable ways are key to the real story.”

The years of research have involved visiting gravesites, uncovering and transcribing historical documents in various registries and databases, and interviewing Sullivan’s surviving ancestors.

“This new information will effectively transform our understanding of this period,” said Fischlin. “The research we have been doing has uncovered information about Shakespeare’s contexts that we never knew before. By investigating the micro-history of the Sanders family that was so intimately associated with Shakespeare’s own cultural, religious, and geographic milieu we can paint a much more detailed picture of the world in which Shakespeare lived.”

The research team found that both families lived in the same small villages in England, intermarried, and may have worked together. Shakespeare’s father and later members of the Sanders family worked as glove makers in the same area over an extended period suggesting that the two families were interlinked by class, economic, and trade considerations.

“With all these connections it’s unthinkable that the two families wouldn’t have known each other,” said Fischlin, “And that includes the personal affiliations and friendships that are no doubt behind the genesis of the Sanders portrait.”

Moreover, Fischlin points out that “the fact that we started with the current owner of the portrait, Lloyd Sullivan, and did the genealogical research backward from him and his immediate family and ended up literally in Shakespeare’s backyard is an extraordinary and compelling aspect of this story. No other portrait even comes close to having this sort of genealogical proximity to Shakespeare’s immediate cultural milieu. We could just as easily have ended up in Ireland or in any number of other places that would have made the portrait’s provenance dubious. But we didn’t.”

The research has also demonstrated that the portrait painter was likely one of two Sanders brothers: John, a painter, or William, a bit actor in Shakespeare’s plays.

The investigation, according to Fischlin, has clarified important historical contexts that affect our understanding of Shakespeare, including his family’s economic status and religion.

“There’s been an ongoing debate about whether Shakespeare came from an elite family and it’s clear from our research that he came from a financially stable family, but not an elite family.”

He has also outlined in greater detail how the famous playwright’s family members were Catholics living in a region of England where Catholicism was extremely active though banned under Elizabeth I’s reign.

“Shakespeare and his family were integrated into a Catholic area and intermarried with Catholic families,” he said. “He had family members who were persecuted for being Catholic and Shakespeare’s own daughter Susanna was named as a recusant in 1606 for not attending an Easter day church service.”

The new research findings are the most comprehensive detailing of the genealogy and origin of the Sanders portrait to date and are only available on the University of Guelph’s Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project (CASP) website. Founded and directed by Fischlin, CASP is the largest and most complete website in the world dedicated to showing Shakespeare’s cultural influence.

Fischlin learned about the Sanders portrait while he and his research team were travelling across the country to uncover original Canadian adaptations of Shakespeare for the project.

Contact: dfischli@uoguelph.ca

Visit the Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project (CASP) site at: http://www.canadianshakespeares.ca/

To view the recently published results of the genealogical research on the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare go to:

https://canadianshakespearenews.wordpress.com/2011/02/27/sanders-portrait-of-shakespeare-provenance-an/


1 Comment

Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare: Provenance and Genealogy

1. The Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare: A Summary of the Genealogical Evidence and Provenance

IMPORTANT NOTE: As of November 2012 crucial new information has been discovered about the early genealogy that precisely links Lloyd Sullivan, the owner of the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare, to the painter. New charts and specific details will be released soon. The new evidence is wholly consistent with the Sanders family lore about the painter of the portrait, with the social and cultural affiliations of the Sanders family with the Midlands and with the Shakespeare family, and with the transmission of the portrait through 13 generations of owners to its current owner. One tantalizing detail is that two of the people in the earliest part of the genealogy were members of the Painter-Stainers Company, the guild officially charged with visual work for everything from coats of arms, to theatre sets, to funerary displays.

“The revelation of Sullivan’s familial relation to the Bard (and, it turns out, to some of the playwright’s friends and intimates) can only heighten interest in––and possibly reinforce––Sullivan’s claims about the so-called Sanders portrait.” James Adams, “Ottawa portrait owner is the Bard’s kin,” Globe and Mail, Friday, Apr. 10, 2009

William Shakespeare shook the dust of the old world of literature from his feet and boldly created a “brave new” one. It is interesting, and perhaps symbolic, that the Sanders portrait was “discovered” in the so-called “new world.” It seems as if the image in the Sanders portrait represents the youthful vigour and vitality of the Americas, while the Martin Droeshout engraving and the Memorial Bust, literally and allegorically, denote a certain faded imperial glory.

Coincidentally, the age of the Sanders portrait roughly matches that of Canada. In 1603, when it was painted, the great explorer Samuel de Champlain had just set his first tentative steps in New France.

According to Sanders family tradition, the portrait was painted by an ancestor, John or William Sanders, a friend of Shakespeare who was a bit player in his company of actors. The current owner of the portrait, Lloyd Sullivan, a direct descendant of the Sanders family that was deeply connected with Shakespeare and his social and cultural milieu, states:

“As I was growing up in the 1940s living in NDG in Montreal, my grandmother who was living with us at the time, mentioned on several occasions that the story that came down through the family was that an ancestor of ours, a Sanders definitely painted the Sanders portrait back in the early 1600s. She said that the family believed that the first name was John or William. Both names are  prevalent throughout the Genealogy Charts [published here for the first time] mapping my direct line of ancestry back to Shakespeare’s moment. So, the painter could have been John Sanders (senior) as he probably was the right age in 1603, or, it could have been his brother William, again depending on his age around the early 1600s.

Based on  a combination of the research so far and on family lore it could have been John Sanders or a William Sanders. But we will need further information that we’re in the process of acquiring. I lean towards William because of the following:

1. In the Lord Chamberlain’s Accounts of 15 March 1604, Part 6 there is a list of the Lord Chamberlain’s Men‘s messengers and William Sanders is mentioned as one of the messengers on page 34 of 40. Then on page 36 William Shakespeare is mentioned in the list of the Lord Chamberlain’s Men players. There is little doubt, given the social and cultural proximity of the court and its players, that William Sanders, being a messenger for Lord Chamberlain, would have had contact with Shakespeare for such things as giving him his pay or passing on instructions or notes from the Lord Chamberlain or others associated with the company of actors.

2. Another reference I received is scholar Gerald Eades Bentley’s The Jacobean and Caroline Stage: Dramatic Companies and Players (2 Vols., Oxford, 1941). In this reference a William Sanders is listed as an actor in the King’s Men on pages 72 and 74 and then again on page 559 (under “Players”). The Dramatic Records of Sir Henry Herbert Master of the Revels, 1623-1673 (New York: Benjamin Blom, 1964: 74) names William Sanders, along with numerous others including Edward Knight, William Pattrick, and William Gascoyne, as “imployed by the Kinges Maiesties servantes in theire quallity of Playinge as Musitions and other necessary attendantes” (click on the image below to see the full entry in Herbert’s records):

Dramatic_records_of_sir_henry_herbert

So, it seems like it is either John Sanders (senior) or his brother William Sanders that painted the Sanders portrait but we will need more information [which we’re currently gathering] … to verify this.” (personal correspondence between Lloyd Sullivan and Daniel Fischlin, 4 March 2011; )

Further research has indicated that at least two other versions of people  with the surname Sanders (sometimes spelled with variants that include Saunder, Saunders, and Sandes, among others) were in close proximity to Shakespeare. David Grote’s book, The Best Actors in the World: Shakespeare and His Acting Company, cites Saunder as an apprentice boy actor to Richard Burbage. This Saunder would have been approximately 24 in 1603, the date indicated on the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare. Here’s some of what Grote’s book gives us in terms of his contributions to the company:

In The Seven Deadly Sins, a boy called Saunder played six of his seven scenes with Burbage. He played two significant roles, Gorboduc’s Queen and the beautiful Procne who is raped by Tereus. We do not know the actual size of the roles, so Saunder might have been as young as thirteen; the important point is that he was obviously Burbage’s boy. Assuming the plot was made in 1592, then this Saunder would have been around sixteen in 1595, the age at which we would expect to see him assigned his largest roles. Juliet is Shakespeare’s (and the Chamberlain’s Men’s) attempt to take full advantage of what must have been his considerable talents. (As was seen earlier, this was not Alexander Cooke, who was about the same age but apprenticed to Heminges. This was also not the “Sander” in the quarto of The Taming of A Shrew played by Pembroke’s Men before 1593, as is sometimes suggested, for the Sander in that script was obviously the company’s adult clown.) (38)

Did this boy actor, apprenticed to the great Burbage (himself recorded as a painter), perhaps realizing the greatness of Shakespeare, start to paint Shakespeare’s portrait in London (with Shakespeare’s permission) while he was close to him? But then not seeing a great future for himself as an actor (he had grown out of playing female roles), did he decide to move to the country to pursue his future and to finish his portrait of Shakespeare in a much safer and quieter environment (away fron the Black Plague and the Catholic persecutions)? This may answer the question of how and why did the Sanders/Saunders family ended up with William Shakespeare’s portrait.

Another possibility of a Sandes/Saunders/Sanders who had connections with Shakespeare is James Sandes (Saunders), who was brother-in-law to Robert Browne, William Robbins, and Christopher Beeston and Uncle to Robert Browne junior. James was known for his acting between 1605 and 1617 and was with the Kingsmen  from 1605 to 1608, not coming back to Warwickshire/ Worcestershire prior to 1617. Frederick Gard Fleay’s A Chronicle History of the London Stage, 1559-1662 lists James Sandes as Augustine Phillips’ apprentice in 1605 (375), the same year Phillips died (in May). Sandes was linked in multiple ways to the London theatre scene. His sister Cecily married Robert Browne (not William Sly) and when William died in 1680 he left his share of the Globe to Robert Browne who did not keep it very long. Browne died in 1622,  and Cecily re-married actor William Robbins. When William Sly, a colleague of Shakespeare’s and Burbage’s in the Lord Chamberlain’s Men and the King’s Men, died in 1608  his Will made mention of James Sanndes (or Sannder) and left James £40 (click on the .pdf below to see evidence of this).

If anything, these facts point to members of the Sanders family who were in close proximity to Shakespeare and his closest associates  in various ways connected to the theatre scene in London and at exactly the time when the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare was painted.

The portrait, the family, and their stories are intertwined and have survived fire, floods, and a transatlantic voyage. The Sanders always kept the portrait close to them––sometimes proudly displayed in their homes, at other times tucked away in a cupboard or under a bed for safe-keeping.

Quietly, the Sanders portrait passed from generation to generation to the present owner, Lloyd Sullivan, who acquired it from his mother, Kathleen Hales Sanders. The portrait’s unique provenance, having been passed through the centuries within one family, is an extraordinary story––one that few portrait histories can duplicate.

The Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project (CASP) is pleased to make available, for the first time,  an abbreviated family tree of the main trunk of the Sanders family associated with the Sanders Portrait, beginning with John Sanders in the sixteenth century and culminating in Lloyd Sullivan, the current owner of the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare.

It is important to understand that this genealogy is really Mr. Sullivan’s genealogy (it originates with him) and explains, in part, why and how the Sanders Portrait ultimately came into his possession as a function of an intergenerational family legacy.

James Adams’s above-cited 2009 article in the Globe and Mail outlines how “Thanks to a still-growing body of genealogical evidence accumulated in the last six years, it’s now clear that Sullivan is indeed kin to the world’s greatest playwright. True, it’s a “relative of relatives / the thigh bone is connected to the backbone via the hip bone” phenomenon, but real nevertheless: a link by what genealogists call “affinity”––in this case, a string of marriages stretching back centuries among families with such sturdy English surnames as Sanders, Throckmorton, Catesby and Arden. Before, during and after Shakespeare’s time, these families lived in closely connected communities in the English Midlands, in such towns as Coughton, Huddington, Droitwich, Temple Grafton, Worcester and Stratford-upon-Avon, Shakespeare’s birth (and death) place.”

Genealogist Pamela J. Hinks’s work shows that “in 1594 Dorothy Saunders, a relative of Sullivan’s, married one John Throckmorton––one instance of a number of marriages involving these families over the decades. Throckmortons also married Ardens, and it was one of those aristocratic Ardens, Mary, who in 1557 became the wife of a John Shakespeare, and seven years later gave birth to a boy christened William. In 1592 another Sullivan relative, Phillipi Sanders, married one Anna Heminges. She was the cousin of none other than John Heminges, born just two years after Shakespeare in Droitwich, near Stratford-upon-Avon. John Heminges later became an actor in Shakespeare’s company, and in 1623 co-edited and published the famous First Folio of the Bard’s plays. Hinks has limned many other linkages. One of the most intriguing concerns another Sullivan relative, Mathew Sanders, the fifth child of a Stephen Saunders––back then, spelling was anything but standardized––born in Coughton in 1677. (Note that the original Globe & Mail article mistakenly cites Mathew’s birthdate  as 1624 and incorrectly references Mathew Sanders as the fifth child of Stephen Sanders––this has been corrected in italics in the current citation). At his death, in 1745 at age 68, Mathew Sanders was found to have a will in which he deeded “eight pictures” to his son William Sanders” (note that the original Globe & Mail article mistakenly says that Mathew deeded the 8 images to John Sanders. The CASP editorial team has corrected this error in what we cite above in italics).

This genealogy is based on historical research that begins with Mr. Sullivan, traces its way back through his known relatives, and ends in the late sixteenth century in the very specific geographic area and community (in and around Coughton) where the Shakespeares, Ardens, Catesbys, Throckmortons, Heminges, and others associated with the Shakespeare legacy are to be found.

No other portrait associated with Shakespeare can make as direct a genealogical claim or argument.

No other portrait or portrait owner has this sort of direct and intimate link into Shakespeare’s own historical moment, cultural milieu, and family. It is important to remember that the only possible reason to account for the portrait ending up in Mr. Sullivan’s possession (and this is based on intergenerational familial provenance) is that the Sanders family kept the portrait as part of its legacy through multiple generations of transmission of the object within the family.

The genealogy clearly shows the branch of the Sanders family to which Mr. Sullivan belongs as being affiliated in multiple ways with Shakespeare’s family and with key historical figures in Shakespeare’s immediate cultural circle. The genealogy also addresses the benchmark set by Sir Roy Strong, former Director of the National Portrait Gallery in England, who stated that the Sanders portrait “‘looks perfectly authentic for 1603, and the costume addressed is absolutely correct,’ but unless  the picture’s provenance could be documented to early in the 1600s, its claim was tentative at best” (cited in Stephanie Nolen, Shakespeare’s Face). This comment was made well before the results of the genealogical work done by Pam Hinks had yielded such a clear and direct link between Mr. Sullivan’s family (the matrilineal trunk via the Sanders) and the exact geographic area that is at the core of Shakespeare’s cultural and social milieu in the Midlands.

The conclusions to be drawn from these genealogical findings are evident.

The remarkable research represented here is the result of British genealogist and antiquarian Pamela J. Hinks multi-year efforts to uncover the trail leading from Mr. Sullivan back to the sixteenth century. Her work has provided the basis for Mr. Sullivan’s own analysis of the data in consultation with a number of Shakespearean experts, including Dr. Daniel Fischlin, Director of the CASP site.

The Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project (CASP) is making this genealogical information public for the first time. Due to the ongoing nature of the research, as well as issues around intellectual property, we are only making a portion of the full research available with more to follow shortly.

CASP remains deeply indebted to the work of Pamela J. Hinks and to Lloyd Sullivan and his family for permission to publish this remarkable genealogical trajectory.

2. The Partial Genealogy: The Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare Passed DownThrough Successive Generations of the Sanders Family

Below is the main family trunk of the Sanders family beginning with the person thought to be the painter (or the son of the painter) of the image, John Sanders, and ending with the current owner of the portrait, Lloyd Sullivan. The genealogy below is partial and represents the highlights of the line from Mr. Sullivan back to his ancestor John Sanders as uncovered by multiple years of extraordinary research accomplished by British genealogist Pamela J. Hinks.

It is important to understand that the relations between the Sanders and Shakespeare families were not glancing but existed over several centuries of contact in various ways.

Watch this space as we publish further photos, documentation, and a more complete family tree associated with the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare.  Over the next few weeks we will also be releasing a more complete description (with evidence) of the extended family relations that existed between the Sanders and Shakespeares.

Earliest information in the genealogy associated with Lloyd Sullivan’s direct line of relatives suggests that the portrait originated with and/or was passed down through one of the following people:

William Sanders (Senior): Great Coughton Inventory dated 1638 (no will)

The three boys born at Coughton––John, William and Stephen––seem to be the sons of William Sanders Senior following on an old Inventory  associated with the death of William in 1638 (died at Coughton). The list reads: Richard Hill, who it seems was dealing with the estate, in attendance with John Sanders, Stephen Sanders, Edmond Bromley, and Frances Palmer. Also a Mary Sanders, widow of William Jones is mentioned. No mention of any pictures is made but the Inventory names main household items (i.e. Coffers etc.) and lists other items in each Chamber without actually naming them. Click on the image below to see the family tree associated with William Sanders:

William_sanders_senior_family_tree

John Sanders: date of birth between 1585-1600at Coughton; will dated 1st September 1660; died 1661

John was son of William Senior above and brother to William and Stephen. His will was written at the request of John by his dear friend Thomas Sheldon and witnessed by Stephen Sanders Junior who made his mark. John left the following when he died in 1661:

To each of his brothers children at the time of his decease 5/-
Servant Maids Frances and Joane (no surname mentioned) 5/- each
Two Servant men Richard and his sonne 5/- each
To my kinswomen Anne Carne? 10/-
The reminder of my estate to my dear wife Katherine and my son Mathew.
No value of the estate. No specific items listed.

William Sanders Junior (Yeoman): date of birth about 1595-1600:Inventory Dated: 1674

William Sanders of Coughton (junior) son of William above, married Anne (unknown surname) who was alive at the time of William’s death. First child born Stephen. 1674 Estate value was:  £39 -05s 2d.  Died at Coughton. Inventory shows main household items (i.e. Coffers etc.) but refers to other items in each Chamber as “listed as other things.” Note that this William was John’s Grandfather’s brother. Click on the image below to view the burial record for William Sanders, buried 19 January 1673, Coughton.

William_sanders_buried_19_jan_1673_coughton

John Sanders (Senior) (Attorney to Sir John Talbot)

Born: Upton-Warren (small hamlet near Droitwich), Worcestershire, England (date of birth about 1559––no records survive for John Sanders’ date of birth and our date is based on the age as Elizabeth Caldwell who died in 1589). Note that no parish records exist for Upton Warren prior to 1604.

Married: Elizabeth Caldwell (Caldwall) of Burton-on-Trent, daughter of William Caldwell (Caldwall) of Burton-on-Trent.

Died (John senior): 1609 Upton-Warren, Worcestershire, England

NOTE: John Sanders’ (senior) and Elizabeth Caldwell’s son, John (junior), was born at Upton-Warren in 1594. Richard Sanders (date of birth about 1535, date of death 1595) of Upton-Warren was his grandfather. Pam Hinks notes that “Upton Warren was a small hamlet of some 2600 acres mainly at the time belonging to the Earl of Shrewsbury (George Talbot) since 1485 (Shrewsbury owned about four-fifths of the property). We know that the Sanders are a fairly wealthy family at the time of them being in Upton-Warren” (email correspondence with Daniel Fischlin 8 May 2011).

Research has found the following 1594 legal document designating John Sanders as one of Sir John Talbot’s lawyers:

John Talbott of Grafton in the County of Worcester Esquire to all Christ’s faithful people to whom this present writing shall come. Greetings in our Lord Eternal. You are to know that I, the aforesaid John Talbott, have ordained, placed and constituted, and by these presents do ordain, place and constitute for me in my place and in my name my beloved in Christ, John Saunders and John Chellingworth of Upton Warren in the aforesaid County of Worcester Yeomen to be my true and lawful attorneys jointly and severally and by theses presents I give to my same attorneys and to each of them jointly and severally full and entire authority and power for me in my place and in my name to take and receive by the delivery of Humfrey Parrott of Forfeeld in the aforesaid County of Worcester gentlemen or of his certain attorneys in this behalf, full and peaceful possession and seisin of and in all those three closes copses or parcels of Woodland called or known by the names of the Hill Lane Coppice, the great Coppice and the little Coppice lying and being in the Parish of Belbraughton in the aforesaid Humfrey Parrott. And after taking the aforesaid possession and seisin to retain and keep the same to the use of me, the aforesaid John Talbott, my heirs and assigns according to the force, form and effect of a certain charter made and completed to me in that behalf by the aforesaid Humfrey, the date of which is the same as the day of the date of these presents; and that I shall ratify and confirm whatsoever my said attorneys or either of them shall do in the premises in such manner and form as if it had been done by me personally.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my seal to this, my present writing. Given the 4th day of October in the 34th year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God, Queen of England, France and Ireland, defender of the faith etc.

Signed John Talbott.[Translation from Latin and Transcription by Pam Hinks; our emphasis]

John Sanders (junior), became an alderman of the City of London—as appears on a monument in the church at Upton-Warren (see gallery below)—and settled a charitable annuity of £10 to be forever paid by the Grocers’ Company, London, for placing out a boy of this parish as an apprentice in London, and for lack of such a boy, then a boy of Stoke Prior or Chaddesley. In 1910 a premium of £10 was paid, and there was a balance of £40 in hand. For full details regarding this charity click on the gallery below:

Genealogical work on this John Sanders continues in order to determine the exact nature of his relationship to the overall genealogy. John Sanders (Junior) of Upton Warren/London exemplifies the mobility between a smaller town like Upton-Warren and London (a mobility that perhaps parallels Shakespeare’s move fron Stratford to London). John Sanders’ (Junior) date of birth was 1 May 1594 Upton-Warren; date of death May 1669 London. He married Mary Langton in 1626 in London (the daughter of Thomas Langton and Barbara Allen;Mary Langton’s brother was Sir John Langton High Sheriff of Lincolnshire). The register copy information for the marriage of John Sanders to Mary Langton is as follows:

John Saunders of St Peters Cheapside London Grocer and Maria (Mary) Langton, daughter of Thomas Langton (Fishmonger) and Barbra Allen19 September 1626, St Mary Stratford Bow, Tower Hamlet, London. To access the registry copy of the marriage as well as a copy of John Sanders’ (junior) burial entry for 7 October 1669, St Peters Cheapside, London, click on the gallery below:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

From the Heralds Visitation of London 1633/34 John is confirmed as an Armiger (an Armour Bearer or Esquire, attendant upon a Knight, but bearing his own unique armorial  device). He was also a London Alderman from 1662-64 and died very rich (Descd. of Simon Langton who was elected Archbishop of York in 1215.)

Click on the gallery below to access more information about John Sanders junior and to see an image of a statue of Stephen Langton (1150 -1228), who  was Archbishop of Canterbury and brother to Simon Langton (both were born in Langton, Lincolnshire). The gallery also includes the 1669 burial record for John Sanders Junior of the Grocers Company, son of John Sanders Senior and Uncle to John Sanders, Painter and member of the Paint Stainers Company (see below).

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

NOTE: Two relatives of John Sanders (junior) have direct connections to painting:

1. Research has shown that Richard Sanders of Upton-Warren had in his Inventory, dated 1631, three painted cloths. This Richard Sanders is the Uncle to Alderman John Sanders born 1st May 1594. Click on the gallery below to access the original documentation of this fact.

Richard_sanders_inventory

2. John Sanders (nephew of John Sanders [Junior––see above] and son of Robert Sanders, John Sanders’ brother, who was born in 1599) was born in 1628 and died in January 1701. This later John Sanders completed his apprenticeship 13 July 1647, where he was granted a license to trade as a professional painter (by this time he would have been in his 20s). In a record in London it is stated that he was also a member of the Paint Stainers Company, an organisation of stainers, or painters of metals and wood (our emphasis), that is known to have existed as early as 1268. John became a Warden in 1674 and Master thereafter in 1680. He died without issue. (Alderman Peyntors & Steynors).

John_sanders_paint_stainers_company

Stainers Art is an interest that John Sanders of Rowington (see below) also had in common since he was recorded (very unusually) as having 3 pictures hanging on his wall in his Inventory in 1617 following his death just 14 years after the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare was painted in 1603. (One can only wonder what the subjects of John’s paintings were.)

It is clear, both in the early and later generations of the Sanders’ genealogy, that an obvious interest in art existed in the family that ran through multiple generations (including the evident  talent of the Sanders portrait artist). Further on in this genealogy please note both Mathew Sanders whose will included 8 pictures and Thomas Hales Sanders, whose work as a painter was exhibited in London.

John Sanders of Rowington died without issue though he was married to Elizabeth Aston.
Stephen Sanders (Senior), grandfather to Mathew (see below)

 Born: circa 1600, Coughton, Warwickshire

Died: 1681, Coughton, Warwickshire

Click on the gallery below to access burial records of Stephen (buried 4th Feb. (?) 1681, Coughton):

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Stephen Sanders (Junior)

 Christened: 28 December 1624, Coughton, Warwickshire,

First Marriage: Eleanor in 1659 at Coughton

Second Marriage: Susanna (Anna) Ruberie on 29 July 1671 at Coughton

Died: 31 August 1702, Coughton, Warwickshire

Inventory dated 1702 for Stephen Sanders (Junior); son of Stephen Sanders (Senior). The  Inventory includes an Admon.

NOTE: Admons contain the name, residence, and occupation of the deceased and of the person or persons appointed to administer the estate.

Stephen left no Will, only an Inventory and Admon, which confirm that at the time of his death his wife Susanna was still alive since she is mentioned on the Inventory as Stephen’s widow. Value of the estate was £73 -12s -0d. Admon granted to Susanna Sanders of Coughton for which she made her mark in 1702. The Inventory shows normal household items with other items “listed as other items.”

Stephen was baptised  28 December 1624 at Coughton and  was married twice: first to Eleanor in 1659 with their short-lived only child John Sanders (1660-1661); and second to Susanna (Anna) in 1671.

The children from Stephen Sanders’ second marriage to Susanna (Anna) are:

1) John Sanders baptised 10 May 1674 Coughton married 1704 to Sarah Edwards at Combrook, Warwickshire (recorded at Warwickshire). John was baptised 10 May 1674 in Coughton. See below for a digitial copy of the baptismal record.
2) Susanna baptised 20 April 1672  Rous Lench married Thomas Parkes
3) William Sanders baptised 10 Dec 1676 Coughton married Katherine Y? (William & Katherine had 6 children; their son Charles was baptised on 16 April 1699)
4) Mathew Sanders was baptised 30 March 1677 Coughton and married Susanna Shenstone
5) Thomas Sanders baptised 16 Jun 1680 married Mary Mills

NOTE: No record has been found for any marriage of Stephen to Anna so one must presume that Susanna was also known as  Anna, especially given that the dating is perfectly in line. John (1674-1729 ) and Mathew (1677-1745 ) are sons of Stephen (dod: 1681) and nephews to the two others mentioned John (dod: 1661) and  William (dod: 1674). Information in Wills has made this possible to conclude as being correct. Please note that this family line is still under research.

For an image of the burial record of Stephen Sanders (father of Mathew, 1677-1745 ) click on the gallery below:

Burial_record--_stephen_sanders_31_aug_1702_father_of_mathew_1677-1745

NOTE: No records survive before 1616 at Coughton.

Pamela Hinks suggests that “Around circa 1624 we have three male lines of Sanders, John, William, and Stephen with no Baptismal records due to the lack of records prior to 1616 in Coughton. Following the common attitude of the day to family naming it is more than likely all three were brothers. From the early 1700s the Sanders started to move on from Coughton nearer to Worcester.

Stephen Sanders was Church Warden in Coughton in 1681 at St Peters Church. The village of Coughton is just 8 miles from Stratford upon Avon. Coughton Court, home of the Throckmortons since 1409, dominates the surrounding area. St Peters Church is located on the outer grounds of Coughton Court.The building is attributed to Sir Robert Throckmorton and dates from between 1486 and 1518. The church tower is thought to be older. Sir Robert Throckmorton died on a Pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1518 for which prior to his journey in his Will he left money to the church for the depiction of “Doom” in stained glass in the East window, and the “Seven Sacraments” in the North Chapel, and finally the Seven Acts of Mercy in the South Chapel. Fragments of these appear to be scattered through the aisle windows. (NOTE: Doom is a painting of the Last Judgement; the Seven Sacraments are the efficacious signs of grace. The whole liturgical life of the Church revolves around the Eucharistic sacrifice and the Sacraments, which are Baptisim, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders and Matrimony; the Seven Acts of Mercy are practises that Christians and the Roman Catholic Church consider expectations to be fulfilled by believers and are also recognised as spiritual aids.)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Images of St. Peter’s Church, Coughton (second image is a stained glass made of fragments of the original glass from the church); the third image is an aerial view of the Coughton Court  grounds showing St. Peters Church where Richard Sanders was Church Warden in 1635 and Stephen Sanders was Church Warden in 1681. This information gives some indication of how important religious life was to various members of the Sanders family in this period.

Thomas Sanders born 1724 in Coughton entered the Society of Jesuits 7 Sept 1744, and was ordained a priest in 1751 (a fact confirmed by the Roman Catholic Archives, Birmingham). Thomas Sanders served at St Georges Roman Catholic Church from 1777 until his death 16 Feb 1790. It is possible that the Thomas Sanders born in 1790 was named after the 1724 Thomas Sanders.

From circa 1624 (records in Coughton, remember, start in 1616)  the Sanders lines continue in Coughton for the next 100 years. Three lines of importance for the Sanders Portrait include Mathew Sanders  (bapt: 30 Mar 1677; husband of Susanna Shenstone, aunt of poet William Shenstone) who left 8 pictures shown in the household Inventory following his death (see below); and the other two being John and William Sanders, who were co-heirs to Mathew’s Will.

A further confirmation of this being the correct line is the mention in Benjamin Sanders’ book The Extraordinary Adventures of Benjamin Sanders:

Benjamin Sander’s father was a member of the Sanders family which owned an extensive business as a woolen drapers and mercers in Worcester for about one hundred and fifty years, between c1700 and c1850. The business of the Sanders family in Worcester was located in Friar Street on the corner with Lich [Leech] Street. Photographs of the building, now demolished, show the name Sanders and a date 1712, embossed on the corner of the building. Benjamin Sanders’ father clearly hoped that his son would inherit the flourishing linen and woollen draper’s business in Bromsgrove from his cousin, James Wilkinson. When he was about twelve years old, he was taken away from school to be apprenticed for seven years to a draper and tailor in Worcester, Mr Lingham. (18)

Whilst searching various records it was clear that several Sanders children became apprentices to the Lingham family including Richard Sanders. In 1712 Gilbert Hawkes was trading  in this building which was taken over by John Hawkes in 1724 and continued until his death in 1756 then passed on to Mary and William Sanders” (email correspondence with Daniel Fischlin 14 February / 26 April  2011).

NOTE:On the Worcester Enrolment/Apprenticeship Book Searches of the registers for the early Enrolment/Apprenticeship books dating back to 1624 make it clear that no Sanders/Saunders were registered prior to 1768 in the City of Worcester. William Sanders  & Mary (Hawkes) and  William Sanders & Anne (Woods) were cousins. Below is the breakdown of Sanders who appear in the Enrolment Books from 1751-1825:

Richard Sanders                1756, born 1744, son of  William & Mary (Hawkes)
John Sanders                      1766, son of Mary Sanders of Tewkesbury near Gloucester
William Sanders                 1768, son of William & Anne (Woods)
Benjamin Sanders             1778, son of William & Anne (Woods)
Ann Sanders                       1771, daughter of William & Anne (Woods)
William  Sanders               1771, son of William & Anne (Woods)
John Sanders                     1821, son of William & Anne (Woods)
George Sanders                 1823, son of John Sanders
Edward Sanders                1824, son of John Sanders
James Sanders                  1824, son of John Sanders
John Hawkes Sanders        1825, son of Bermondsey William
John Sanders

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

John Sanders’ baptism (copy taken from original Coughton Parish Records)

Baptized: 10 May 1674 Coughton

Married: Sarah Edwards 17 Oct 1704

Died: 3 June 1729

Children:

William 7 October 1705 (married Mary Hawkes; see below)

Eliz 23 May 1706

Mary 10 Nov 1708

Stephen 28 Jul 1712 (died young)

Ann 1714

1st John 1717 (died an infant)

2nd John 1719

Thomas 1724 Priest at St. Georges Roman Catholic Church Worcester, which was attended by the Hawkes/Sanders family until his death in 1790 (Thomas, born 1790, may well have been named after his uncle; see below)

Mathew Sanders
NOTE: Mathew Sanders was brother to John above. Although not in the direct line back from Lloyd Sullivan, Mathew is important because of what he passed on to his son William; see below)
Christened: baptised 30 March 1677 at Coughton, Warwickshire, England

Married: Susanna Shenstone, 15 February 1707 at Halesowen (aunt of William Shenstone, famous poet of the day). Mathew and Susanna’s son John was baptized on 28 December 1708 at Tardebigg. See the picture gallery below. Thomas Sanders (Saunders) was the youngest son of Mathew and Susanna (Shenstone) and served in the Navy. Click on the .pdf below to see two letters associated with Thomas:

Died: Both Mathew & Susanna died on 9 September 1745 at Bromsgrove. Mathew was aged 68 at his death.
NOTE: Mathew Sanders died intestate. The Admon was passed to John and William Sanders (sons of Mathew).  The official Inventory of his estate included “8 pictures,” which he passed on to his son William. The Mathew Sanders’ Inventory that lists the “8 pictures” makes it very apparent that these pictures were well thought of by Mathew Sanders to have been listed at all. Click on the image below to see a copy and transcription of the Inventory as well as to see a copy of the marriage record of Mathew and Susanna Shenstone (15 February 1707 Halesowen) and a copy of Mathew and Susanna’s Burial Record, 9 Sept 1745, Tardebigg.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Recent research has also unearthed a John Sanders who died in 1617 in Rowington.  “More Shakespeares lived in Rowington in the sixteenth century than in any other Warwickshire parish” (Mark Eccles, Shakespeare in Warwickshire, 1961). The Sanders/Saunders family is recorded as being involved in the Rowington community and its members often witnessed deeds and performed many other local community duties. They are also included in the tax records indicating their upper class status in that historical moment. Several entries in the Rowington Charter are made indicating that members of the Sanders family were church wardens at Rowington.

Further, despite the fact that between the years of 1606 and 1647 Rowington records are very sparse,  whilst searching for information with regards to the Catholics in Rowington ontly 2 records could be found with regards to recusancy. It is clear that Rowington had a strong congregation of Catholics. At the Epiphany  Quarter Sessions in 1648 (Sessions Indictment Book Vol VI p. 82) twenty men and women were accused of recusancy. Two of the indicted were John Hunt and his wife Elizabeth (sister and heir to John Sanders who died in 1617); both John and his wife were also recorded in 1605/06 as being Catholics. Click on the image below for more information on the Epiphany Quarter Sessions of 1648, showing several members of the Shakespeare family and also John Hunt widower  who in 1605/6 was indicted for recusancy.

The Inventory of John Sanders made 2nd August 1617 shows that the house had a Hall, and was well furnished with tables, 2 chairs, stools, cupboards, in the hearth a shovel, bellows, links and old hooks from which to suspend pots and so forth over the fire. On the walls were three ‘picktures.’ There was also a parlour, little chamber and a new chamber, buttery and kitchen, downstairs and a upstairs, the chamber over the parlour, chamber over the kitchen and a storage room in which he had beef, bacon, 17 fleeces of sheep, tubs, and the like. There was also a room over the dairy that was a storage room. The kitchen was very well stocked with utensils and also had a fireplace––not always to be found in kitchens, which were often at that time used for storage, the cooking being done in the Hall. There was also a stable and two horses and a carthorse. No further Surveys were carried out in Rowington until 1649. John was buried 30th July 1617.

Due to the non-existence of Parish records before 1638 it has been difficult to trace the Sanders/Saunders line that may have been the direct link to Mathew Sanders at Coughton some 13 miles away (from Rowington), who had eight pictures mentioned in his Inventory in 1745. Remember that John Hawkes Sanders passed his heirloom (the Sanders portrait) down without any record of whom it was handed to and this may have been (and quite probably was) the same case in prior legacy arrangements involving the Sanders portrait. It is quite possible that the Sanders portrait was included and listed with “Sundries” in various estate inventories and wills.

Around 1610 almost certainly the wealthy householders in Rowington, including the Whitely End Farm, had murals painted on the walls. Painted cloths were recorded in only six Rowington properties and Carpet cloths in only five, including the home of John Sanders. But John also started an entirely new fashion in the parish by being the first to have such  items called “picktures”  hanging in his hall, which was recorded in 1617 just fourteen years after the Sanders portrait of Shakespeare was painted. Their mention is unusual and indicates that they were valued enough to deserve specific inclusion in the Inventory. What happened to them? Was one of them the Sanders portrait? Did they travel the line of John’s kinsman being passed down the family eventually to Mathew, and then further down to the present owner Lloyd Sullivan, some 11 generations in total?

Click on the gallery below to access a copy of the original inventory from John Sanders and its transcription. The gallery also includes an Enrolment Deed dated 1717,  one of the last items recorded relating to the Sanders family in Rowington before they moved to other areas, and copies of Returns of Recusants 1605-06 for Rowington.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

William Sanders

Baptized: 7 October 1705 Coughton

Married: Mary Hawkes 10 May 1737 St. Helens Worcester

Died:  15 November 1776

NOTE: Pam Hinks describes her work on this important aspect of the genealogy as follows: “When first looking for the family of William and Mary Hawkes initially l searched every parish record in the City of Worcester to build up various families since it was thought the painter was born in the City. Having established the St Helen’s Parish records it seemed an Ann was born to William and Anne Woods in 1754, bearing in mind that St Helen’s was the City parish for not only the Sanders/Woodes family but also for the Sanders/Hawkes even though they were parishioner’s of St Georges. (William Sanders and Mary Hawkes were related to William and Anne Woodes.)

Ann Sanders c. 1754 (Spinster) of St Helens married Daniel Ford in Bromsgrove 1777 at the age of 23 years. Following the records one would have assumed that this Ann was Anne Woodes’ daughter until the document of John Hawkes Sanders was found, which confirms without any doubt  that Ann Ford was his Sister (she was sister also to Richard).  This required further research, which l have now done:  two Anns were born in 1753/4, yet only one was shown in the Parish records. Due to the records of St Georges RC being missing from 1749-58 one can assume that she was in these omitted records, this is the only logical and acceptable reason. A marriage bond drawn up in October 1777 for £1000.00 between Daniel Ford and Ann states that Daniel was 30 years old and Ann was 23 years old, which makes her born about 1754. Between 1749 and 1758 no records survived at St Georges Roman Catholic Church and this explains why Ann was shown as the daughter of William & Ann. The Ann born 1747 must have died as a child (so many Anns died at this time as to make it difficult to determine when).

So to recap: William Sanders’ and Mary Hawkes’ daughter Ann (2nd), who would have probably been named after Ann Hawkes (Mary’s sister in law), was born in 1754 St Georges RC and married Daniel Ford.”
Note also that William Sanders and Mary Hawkes also had a son born in 1742 named William Sanders. This latter William Sanders was an Attorney who married Sarah Smith. They in turn had a son named William Saunders who was also an Attorney (William born 1742 was also an Attorney, which may possibly have been why the name Saunders was used with the slight spelling variant). The youngest daughter of William Saunders the Attorney (cousin to Thomas) and Lucy O’Toole was Selina Sarah Saunders Countess de Villeneuve. Their eldest daughter was Lucy (Saunders) Hornyold (sister to Sarah Selina). Selina Sarah Saunders marriage certificate reads as follows: “Baroness Celina de Pille full age Widow (of the Comte de la Boissiere) residence at time of marriage Stroud Street, Dover, daughter of William Saunders Esq to Joseph Adolphe de Buora de Villeneuve full age Count also living at Residence in Stroud Street, Dover son of Count Charles Joseph Buora de Villeneuve.”

Joseph Adolphe was born in Nantes 22 April 1814 and died at Versailles April 16th 1867 (they had no issue)
See the gallery below for images of Selina Sarah, Lucy, and Selina Sarah’s marriage certificate:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Richard Sanders (1744-1837; son of William Sanders and Mary Hawkes and great great great grandfather to Lloyd Sullivan)

Baptized: 21 April; 1744 St. Georges Catholic Church

Married: 1st Wife Sarah Harris, July 11, 1772 at All Saints RC Church in Worcester. Richard Sanders and Sarah Harris had several sons, one of whom was named William, otherwise known as Bermondsey Willie because he lived at Snowfields, Bermondsey. William was born in 1775 and died in 1825 at Bermondsey, England.
NOTE: Bermondsey Willie’s son was John Hawkes Sanders of Lich Street in Worcester, born in 1809. He was a woolen draper. John Hawkes died of a stroke on Oct. 22, 1871 at the age of 62. He was heir to Richard Sanders’ estate. John Hawkes Sanders is the uncle John mentioned by Thomas Hales Sanders (Lloyd Sullivan’s great grandfather) in the Connoisseur Magazine article by M.H.Spielmann in 1909––this uncle John is the person through whom the Sanders Portrait is thought to have made its way to Thomas Hale Sanders. The genealogical line makes John Hawkes Sanders (1809-1871) Lloyd Sullivan’s great great great uncle. Click on the gallery below to see a copy of John Hawkes Sanders’ muncipal citizenship in Worcester as well as a copy of his Will, a “Petition with regards to the Estate of John Hawkes Sanders deceased,” and Edward Hailes’ indenture in which John Hawkes Sanders is mentioned several times.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Married: 2nd Wife Elizabeth Owen (née Hailes; later with family usage it became Hales) married 12 July 1789 St Peters, Worcester. Both were widowed at the time of their marriage. Elizabeth was baptized Elizabeth Hailes and had been married to John Owen. John Owen was born 31 Jul 1774 to John Owen and Elizabeth Owen (Hales) at Mamble the family location of the Hales family including the ones at Harvington Hall. See the gallery below for more information on the Hailes/Hales:
Hales_line

NOTE: Richard Sanders’ and Elizabeth Hales’ first son, Thomas Sanders (see below), was christened on 3 February 1790 at St. George’s Roman Catholic Church in Worcester. The transcription from the St. Georges Registry (p. 36, 16 March 1790) reads:

Thomas Sanders son of Richard & Elizabeth Sanders
born ye 3rd Inst
Sponsors Richard Sanders junior and Ann Smith junior

Thomas Sanders is Lloyd Sullivan’s great great grandfather and was both a banker and an artist.
Died: 29 January 1837

NOTE: Richard Sanders is mentioned in the following Indenture. William Shakespeare was born of John Shakespeare, also a glover and leather merchant. This information is important because it places, over an extended period, the two families in virtually the same economic register and class relation making their contact in the same very localized geographic area virtually inevitable:

Indenture 14 Dec 1756 Richard Sanders:

Be it remembered that by Indenture bearing even date herewith Richard son of William Sanders of the City of Worcester Glover by the consent of his said father did put himself Apprentice to George Lingham of the said City of Worcester. Taylor to serve from the date here of unto the full term of seven years and as well the said master as the said Apprentice desire the involvement of the said Indenture amongst the recorder of the said City and to them it is granted

Richard Cope Hopton Esq
Town Clerk

To see a copy of a newspaper (Berrows Newspaper) notice of Richard Sanders’ death along with a transcription of a statement detailing his estate on his death and a memorial plaque, click below. This gallery also includes full transcriptions of two bonds associated with Richard Sanders in 1829:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Thomas Sanders/Saunders (1790-1862; Banker & Artist; father to Thomas Hales Sanders/Saunders and great great grandfather to Lloyd Sullivan)

Born: February 3, 1790 at Worcester, Worcestershire, England

Baptized: February 16, 1790 at St. Georges Catholic Church, Worcester.

First Marriage: Mary Holder on October 18, 1814 at Catholic Chapel and at St. Martins Church, Worcester. Mary died September 22, 1824 and was buried at St. George’s Roman Catholic Church in Worcester. Mary Holder and Thomas Sanders had one son, Richard Sanders, who was born on August 30, 1823 and died February 6, 1895 at Worcester.

Second Marriage: Mary Griffiths on August 30, 1831, at St. Mary’s Catholic Church, and at Warndon Church, Worcester. Mary Griffiths was born April 18, 1805 in Worcester and died January 8 1892 at the age of 86.

NOTE: Thomas Sanders and Mary Griffiths had 11 children. Their first child, Thomas Hales Sanders, was christened on 5 June 1830 at St. George’s Roman Catholic Church in Worcester. Thomas Hale Sanders died on 26 October 1915 in Balham, Wandsworth County of London at age 85. Note that all the female line of the Sanders born to Thomas Sanders and Mary Griffiths was named after the Hales girls; the male line was mainly named after the Sanders boys.

Click below to see an image of twins Elizabeth and Charles, children of Thomas and Mary, and brother and sister of Thomas Hales-Sanders, Lloyd Sullivan’s great grandfather. The twins were born on 14 March 1832 at Worcester, England. Charles died in Melbourne, Australia on 24 September 1897. Elizabeth married Joseph Bailey (died 27 February 1859) at St. Andrews, Worcester on 7 February 1853. Elizabeth died 25 January 1901 at Balham, England.

Elizabeth_and_charles_twinchildren_to_thomas_sanders

Thomas Hale Sanders is Lloyd Sullivan’s great grandfather.

Thomas Sanders married his first wife Mary Holder under the name of Saunders and his second wife Mary Griffiths under the name of Sanders. Such spelling variations are common throughout the lineage.

Genealogical Notes (for Thomas Sanders and Mary Griffiths):

Marriage Certificate:

Thomas Sanders (wid.) & Mary Griffiths (spinster) dated 31st August 1829

Witnessed by Edward Lee  and Elizabeth Griffiths ( Mary’s Twin Sister)

Married at St Georges Catholic Church Worcester, 31st August 1829 & 31st August 1829 Warndon Church Worcester

Witnesses:  Edward Lee (brother-in-law to Mary Holder, Thomas’s first wife) & Elizabeth Griffiths Mary’s twin sister. Mary & Elizabeth were born 18th April 1805, daughters to William & Elizabeth Griffiths.

Interestingly, the twin sisters’ cousin was John Hales Griffiths, which suggests that the Hales family played an important part in both the Sanders and the Griffiths families. See John Hales Griffiths’ marriage certificate below:

John_hales_griffithsmarriagecert

Mary (Griffiths) died in her 87th year  8 Jan 1892 some 30 years after Thomas. On the Census for 1881 she was living with her daughter Elizabeth Bailey at East Street Worcester near St Georges Catholic Church.
Died: Thomas Sanders died July 6, 1862 at Oldswinford, England.

NOTE: Genealogist Pam Hinks posits the following set of relationships in which Thomas Sanders figures:
“The first mention of any brother to Thomas Sanders born 1790 comes from William’s will in 1837 when he leaves a small legacy to both John and Richard, brothers of Thomas. We know this is the correct Thomas since both in William’s will and on the Census, Thomas is listed in the legal profession (he was working for William). I spent quite a lot of time trying to locate John, presuming in the first instance he was the son of Richard and Sarah (who l may add was 14 years older than Richard). No record for him was found so l then searched under the name of Owen and came across John being the son of Elizabeth Hales’s first marriage to John Owen––hence step-brother to Thomas. I would be more inclined to think that the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare came from John Hawkes Sanders (the maestro of the family) who was born 4 May 1739 and died at  St Helen’s Worcester 17 Dec 1821 age 82. This John was in the Cloth Trade. What a wonderful possible Wedding gift for Thomas and Mary Holder in 1814. Richard Sanders died 25th November 1821 and John Hawkes Sanders died 3 weeks later 17 December 1821, which must have been terrible shock to the family. The notice of death for John Hawkes Sanders known as the Uncle John who passed the family heirloom of Shakespeare to Thomas Sanders reads as follows:

This day, in the 83rd year of his age, Mr John Hawkes Sanders,
of this city; a gentleman universally esteemed for the integrity >
of his conduct through life and benevolent disposition. In him the
poor will sustain a severe loss, his purse being always open to
the calls of charity and the claims of the indigent.”

(from correspondence with Daniel Fischlin 6/16 March 2011)

John Hawkes Sanders is recorded in the following way in the Worcester City  Enrolment Book 62 (1825):

10 June 1825

Be it remembered that be Indenture bearing date 28 May 1825 John Hawkes Sanders by and with consent of his father William Sanders of Savoursfield Bermondsey in the County of Surrey Leather Dyer and finisher did put himself apprentice to Richard Sanders of the City of Worcester Draper and Men’s Mercer for 7 years couson of 29£ to be paid to him by the said William Sanders on or before the 25th August next ensuring the date hereof the said Master finding into his said Apprentice sufficient Meat Drink Medicine Cloths Washing lodging and all the mecef seves during the said term

Sealed and delivered by the within named
John Hawkes Sanders and Richard Sanders
in the presence of Tho Sanders of Worcester

And in the following document:

John Hawkes Sanders to Robert Murrey
Draft lease of a house in St Georges Place Tything for a period of 10 years
John Hawkes Sanders of Lich Street Wollen, Draper
Robert Murrey of St Georges Place City Draper
“J.H.Sanders doth demise and lease unto the said Rt Murray, his executors and administrators. All that Dwelling house with garden in front and yard and back kitchen or wash house at the back thereof situate in St Georges Place fronting the street called the Tything in the City of Worcester and now in the occupation of the said Rt Murrey.
Together with the actual and reputed appurtenance’s to the same adjoining and belonging and together also with free liberty to take down and remove the said back kitchen or wash room and to sell and dispose of the materials thereof.
To have and to hold the said dwelling house garden yard and premises with their appurtenances unto the said R. Murrey his executors and administrators from the 25th day of March last for and during and unto the full end term of ten years hence next ensuring and fully to be complete and ended. Yielding and paying thereof yearly during the said term unto the said J.H.Sanders his heirs.”
Witnessed by John Sanders
Solicitors Clerk 
24th April 1867
And in the following document (transcribed) involving a loan he made to his nephew Richard:

Note that John Sanders Clerk (Son of Thomas Sanders c. 1790) was living at Cole Hill, Wylds Lane at the time of his death in 1871.  His Death Certificate can be accessed in the gallery below:

In the District of Worcester South in the County of WorcesterJohn Sanders bapt: 16th March 1836

Son of Thomas Sanders
Lived Cole Hill, Wylds Lane Worcester, Aged 36, Clerk at Attorneys, Disease of the Lungs 6 months certified,  present at time of death of Broad Street Worcester.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

John Sanders was married twice on the same day to the same woman (Emily Maria Stokes) as attested to by the following information:

Marriage Cert. 1Marriage Certificate Worcester District

1864 Marriage solemnized at the Roman Catholic Chapel, Sansome Street, Worcester
10th Oct 1864

John Sanders age 29 Bachelor, Writing Clerk.  Address at time of marriage: Upper Henwick Road St Clements, Worcester.  Son of Thomas Sanders (deceased). Father’s profession: Attorney’s Clerk & Emily Maria Stokes age 27 Spinster.  Address at time of marriage: 35 Broad Street, All Saints, Worcester. Daughter of  Charles Stokes.  Father’s profession: Basket Maker.

Marriage Certificate 2
10th Oct 1864
Certificate of the marriage at Claines Church, Worcester
Death Cert: John Sanders

Son of Thomas Sanders
born: 16 Mar 1835
christened: 17 Mar 1835
date of death: 12 Oct 1871 (his youngest would have been less than 1 year old)
Mar: 1864 Emily Maria Stokes
1871 Census living at 14 Cole Hill, Wylds Lane, Worcester  ( St Peters Parish)
Children:
John Hawkes Sanders  b 1870
Mary Lucy Sanders b 1866
Thomas J Sanders b 1868
Emily Sanders b 1869
The 1871 Census shows John working as a Clerk in an Attorney’s office (William Saunders). He followed in his father’s footsteps. He died of lung disease, possibly TB.
Also the other death in the family in this year (1871) was John Hawkes Sanders of Lich Street (London John born to Bermondsey William).  This was the John who inherited the family business in Lich Street from Uncle Richard.

John Hawkes Sanders is also recorded in this Indenture:

“This Indenture made the 28th day of Feb 1872 Between Eliza Phillis late of Woodhouse near Leeds in the County of York but now of Lich Street in the City of Worcester. Widow and Henry ? of Mealcheapen Street in the City of Worcester. Grocer of the first part Frederick Wadeley of Cole Hill in the said City of Worcester law stationer of the 2nd part & William Ockey of the Parish of Suckly in the County of Worcester Farmer & Thomas  ? of the City of Coventry Woollen Draper of the 3rd pt. Whereas by an Indr of MTG dated the 18th day of Nov 1867 and made between the Sd F Wadeley of the one part and Jno Hawkes Sanders rthen of the Sd City of Worcester, Wollen Draper & since dec’d of the ot pt.

It was agreed that in conson of £500 sterling pd by the Sd J.H.Sanders to the F . Wadeley the Sd F Wadeley did grant & convey unto the Sd J.H.Sanders his hrs & ofsns all those two then newly erected Messuages or houses & offices with the Gdns Ground thereto adjoined & belong to the piece of land at the back thereof situated at Cole Hill in the Parish of St Peter’s the Great City of Worcester the in the occupation of the Sd Octavis Harding.”

 NOTE: Eliza Phillis was the Sister of John Hawkes Sanders who contested his Will.
John Hawkes Sanders is also recorded in the 1851 Census:
36 Lich Street Worcester

John Hawkes Sanders head of Household unmarried age 37 Woollen Draper born Surrey/London.
Catherine New unmarried age 53 Housekeeper born Worcester.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The Original Warehouse No 1, bottom of Leech Street

Worcester
Established 1712
JOHN H. SANDERS 

1 Lich Street (Leech) Worcester, was where the Hawkes family business was located––later it became the Sanders’ through the marriage between Mary Hawkes and William Sanders. Sometime in the 1800s the building was renovated: the name Sanders & 1712 are thought to have been added at this time.

NOTE: Lich Street (variously spelled: Lich Leech Leach) and the Sanders family (Worcester, England) Lich Street was in the heart of the medieval area of Worcester near the edge of the land surrounding the Cathedral. By the end of the 18th century the old fashioned houses on Lich St. had been converted into tenements. 1 Lich Street was on the corner of Lich/Friar Street. At sometime in the early 18th century it was rebuilt proudly showing the start of the business back in 1712 inscribed on the upper wall. The Sanders family had been part of the 18th century business boom that carried on the high respect the Sanders family had gained over the 100 years plus in the trade. Richard Sanders ran a shop at No 1 Lich Street and was listed in the business directories of Worcester outlined below:Lewis’s Directory 1820: Woollen Draper

Pigots Directory 1828: Woollen Draper, Salesman, Hatter and Hosier

Pigots Directory 1835: Lined Draper and tailor

A Worcester Guide 1837:  (the year he died) Richard is listed as a linen draper, silk mercer, and tailor.

Richard died at the age of 67 in his home above the shop. The announcement following his death in the Worcester Journal confirmed he was a man ‘whose real worth was appreciated by all who knew him,’ a comment frequently found concerning the Sanders family generally in Worcester. Following his death a stock valuation was taken for which it was recorded a total value of £1892 12s 9d; his household furniture and items amounted to £210.6s 9d and his clothing was valued at £15 14s.

John Hawkes Sanders, Richard’s qualified apprentice and nephew inherited the business. Following the finalization of Richard’s estate, John billed the estate for £43 9s 4d for the funeral expenses including coffin and items supplied by the drapery firm. Richard had a lavish funeral, with six boys and six girls supplied in mourning dress.

Click on the gallery below to see a copy  of the Will of John Hawkes, husband of Mary Hawkes and Father of Mary Sanders. John left £10 to Ann Hawkes, his daughter-in-law of his deceased son John and the rest of his Real and Personal estate to be divided between Mary (his wife) and Mary Sanders his daughter  and wife of William Sanders, the estate was not dealt with for some years until after the death of Mary Hawkes. Also included in this gallery are John Hawkes Sanders’ Birth and Death Certificates:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The Three John Hawkes Sanders

NOTE: One of the challenges in establishing as lengthy a genealogy as this over as extended an historical timeframe (11 generations) is recurring names. John Hawkes Sanders recurs three times in the Sanders line associated with Lloyd Sullivan. Below is a listing of the three John Hawkes Sanders from most recent to most distant. A genealogical table that shows these three in relation to each other is posted in the gallery below.

John_hawkes_sanders_chart

1. The most recent John Hawkes Sanders was born 4th March 1870 of Cole Hill,  St Peters, Worcester and died in 1951. He was the  son of John Sanders (born 1835)  and Emily Maria Sanders formerly Stokes. His father’s occupation was Clerk at Attorney. This John Hawkes Sanders is junior grandfather to Thomas Sanders born in 1790.

2.  John Hawkes Sanders (born 5 February 1811) of Lich Street Worcester male age 62 years Woollen Draper.  Died from aphasia apoplexy 3 years certified (modern day stroke) 22 October 1871. Son of William Sanders (Bermondsey Willie; born 1775, died 1825) also a woollen draper who came to Worcester on an apprenticeship for Richard, and heir to Richard Sanders who died 1837 of Lich Steet, Worcester. He was also brother to Henry and Richard Sanders.

3. John Hawkes Sanders born 4 May 1739, died 1821 (Worcester), married to Anne Andrews 1772. Son of William Sanders (Glover; 1705-1776) and Mary Hawkes.  Brother to William, Richard, Ann, Frances, and Mary. John’s brother Richard married three times and his second and third marriages produced the lines that generate the other two John Hawkes Sanders.

Thomas Hales Sanders/Saunders (1830-1915; Banker & Artist; great grandfather with Henrietta Martha Fitzgerald to Lloyd Sullivan)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Thomas Hales Sanders circa 1913 and Thomas Hales Sanders’ House (Rainbow Hill Terrace, Worcester) built in 1817 (first two images). At the time Thomas lived in this house he would have had a beautiful view over the City of Worcester––just across the road from where Sir Edward Elgar lived some years later. Included in this gallery is the Marriage Certificate for Thomas Hales Sanders and Henrietta Martha Fitzgerald and a list of paintings exhibited by T. Hale Sanders (listed as Painter, 25 Byrne Road, Balham) at the Royal Academy, London. The painted images in the gallery are by Thomas Hales Sanders of his two sons, Aloysius Louis and Francis Ambrose, done when Aloysius was 14 and Francis was 12 in 1878, and both a sketch and a painted version of a Venetian cityscape. Also included in this gallery are images of Ushaw College (founded in 1808, Durham England) and primarily concerned with educating students for the Catholic priesthood (it is a direct descendant of the English College at Douai France founded in 1568 by William [later Cardinal] Allen). Thomas Hales Sanders’ two sons, Aloysius and Francis attended this college with Francis dying two days after he left the college. The last images in the gallery are Thomas Hales Sanders’ will, proved December 14, 1915 in which his “reputed portrait of Shakespeare 1603” is given to his son Aloysius Joseph James Hales Sanders.
Born: June 3, 1830 at St. George’s Catholic Church, Worcester, Worcestershire, England

Married: Henrietta Martha Fitzgerald on October 12, 1858 at St. Mary’s Catholic Chapel, Chelsea, England. daughter of Jacob Fitzgerald. Henrietta was born in Birmingham 4th July 1832 and died September 9, 1918 at 21 Endlesham Road Balham, Wandsworth County, England.
Thomas Hales Sanders son of Thomas Sanders and Henrietta Martha Fitzgerald
Died: Thomas died October 26, 1915 at 21 Endlesham Road, Balham, Wandsworth  County of London, England

NOTE: The first recorded owner of the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare was John Sanders, Thomas Hales Sanders’ uncle, who is referred to in The Connoisseur Magazine article by M. H. Spielmann. Spielmann was an art critic with an interest in Shakespearean portraiture who Lloyd Sullivan’s great grandfather, Thomas Hale Sanders brought the painting to in London England in 1908 for evaluation. In the article, Spielmann quotes  Hales Sanders as saying that he can remember the picture, which had been for nearly a century in the possession of his relations, and had always been supposed to be a portrait of Shakespeare: “I can remember it for between sixty and seventy years,” [Thomas Hales Sanders] says. “It belonged originally to an uncle of mine, John Sanders, who resided in the adjoining county of Worcester (in Wyld’s Lane), and was, I believe engaged in some kind of woolen trade (the union farm). As to its antiquity, I think there is no doubt on the face of it …” Hales Sanders goes on to say: “At my uncle’s death it came into the possession of [my] father, and thence to me.” Thomas Hales Sanders’  father was Thomas Sanders (see above), who was christened Feb, 16, 1790 and died July 6, 1862. His first wife was Mary Holder, (Thomas Hales Sanders’ mother) and his second wife was Mary Griffiths.  Thomas Hales Sanders’ uncle (from whom the family inherited the Sanders Portrait), John Hawkes Sanders (Woolen Draper), was baptized 4 May 1739 at St. George’s Catholic Church Worcester, Worcestershire, England. He died in Worcester (17 December 1821). Thomas Hales Sanders is described in H. J. Morgan’s Canadian Men and Women of the Time (Part 1, 1912 2nd Edition) as “a noted artist” and as a member ” of the Royal Inst. of Painters, Eng., and an exhibitor at the Royal Acad.” (p. 489).

Aloysius (Louis) Joseph James Hales Sanders/Saunders, M.A. (1864-1919; Educator; father to Kathleen Hales Sanders and grandfather with Agnes Helen Biggs to Lloyd Sullivan)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Aloysius Hales Sanders, n.d.; Aloysius Hales Sanders circa 1904-06 (pictured on the left of both groups of schoolboy. The penultimate photo in this gallery shows the Hales Sanders family with Aloysius and Agnes Hales Sanders and their seven children. The photo was taken in Montreal in 1908. Before this photo was taken 3 of their children died in infancy (two in England before the family immigrated to Canada in 1984, and one child a number of years after the family arrived in Montreal). After this photo was taken, Aloysius and Agnes had three more sons all born in Montreal. The young lady standing in the back of row just to the right of her father, Aloysius (seated), is Mary Agnes Hales Sanders (eldest daughter) who brought the Sanders portrait to New York to have it displayed at the Stern Brothers theatre exhibit in 1928. Lloyd Sullivan’s mother, Kathleen (youngest daughter) is seen standing and leaning against her father in the front row just in front of her mother next to the desk. The last photo in the gallery shows uncle Frederick Hales Sanders (standing) and the five sisters: Alice (Faughman), Kathleen (Lloyd Sullivan’s mother), Hattie (Hamilton), Edith (Lunny), and Aggie. Sullivan’s grandmother Agnes, along with Hattie, Rudolph (Roy), and Alice went to England to take possession of the Sanders portrait from the British probate court. Rudolph spent the rest of his life in London and married Kitty (Catherine). This gallery also shows the Hales Sanders family tree and includes a copy of his immigration record and his Notre Dame (Montreal) burial record. He emigrated on the Pickhuben arriving in Montreal on August 15, 1894, the ship having had as its points of departure both Antwerp, Belgium and Hamburg, Germany.

Born: May 7, 1864 at Lowestoft, Suffolk, England

Baptized: May 11, 1864 at St. Yarmouth Catholic Church, Yarmouth, England

Married: Agnes Helen Biggs on April 11, 1887 at Catholic Church, Croydon, England

Note: Aloysius and Agnes Helen and their family immigrated to Montreal, Quebec, Canada in 1894, according to the 1901 Canadian census.

Died: March 11, 1919 in Outremont (Centre Ville), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Agnes Helen (née Biggs) Hales Sanders/Saunders (Aloysius’s Widow and Grandmother to Lloyd Sullivan)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The gallery above has images of Agnes Hales Sanders as a young and as an older woman and on her voyage to London to reclaim the Sanders portrait. The last photo in the gallery shows Agnes with her husband Aloysius and her children: (from left to right) Henrietta (Hattie),Edith, Agnes Helen, Kathleen, (at Agnes’s feet), Frederick (Fred), Aloysius, Rudolph (Roy), Agnes (Aggie), and Alice.

 Born: October 16, 1866 at 37 Lambs Conduit Street, in Holborn, Middlesex, England

Married: Aloysius Hales Sanders/Saunders on April 11, 1887 at Catholic Church, Croydon, Englan.

Son: Rudolph (Roy); Daughters: Alice, Hattie, and Kathleen

Died: March 24, 1943 in Notre-Dame-de-Grace, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

NOTE: Agnes Hales Sanders is Lloyd Sullivan’s grandmother. She was the woman who went to London with her son and two daughters (Roy, Alice, and Hattie) to retrieve the Sanders Portrait in the Fall of 1919. See the above gallery for more information on the trip to London to reclaim the Sanders Portrait.

Mary Agnes (Uggie) Hales Sanders

Aunt_uggie

Born: January 16, 1890 at Thornton Heath, London, England

Baptized: At Catholic Church, Croydon, England

Married: Never married

Died: October 19, 1959 in Notre-Dame-de-Grace, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

NOTE: Mary Agnes Hales Sanders was Lloyd Sullivan’s unmarried aunt, his mother’s oldest sister who lived with the family for years in NDG, in Montreal. The family called Mary Agnes, Aunt Uggie. Aunt Uggie  is important because she arranged for the Sanders portrait to go on display for the first time ever in the theatre exhibit that opened at Stern Brothers in New York on Oct. 28, 1928. When Aloysius died the portrait hung for awhile in Sullivan’s grandmother’s home in Outremont (ironically on the same street where filmmaker Anne Henderson, Battle of Wills, lives).  In 1928 Lloyd Sullivan’s  grandmother Agnes Helen gave the portrait as a gift “Inter Vivo” to her eldest daughter, Mary Agnes (Uggie),  Sullivan’s mother’s sister who lived with them for many years in Montreal.

Uggie was interviewed for the Stern Brothers exhibit and said that Shakespeare and Sanders were supposed to have been close friends and that their names are to be seen together in an old visitors’ book kept at the Swansea Inn, London. Before it came into her possession, Miss Sanders said, the painting was previously owned by her grandfather, Thomas Hale Sanders, also a painter, who was an exhibitor of the Royal Academy. On his death in 1915, it was willed to Miss Sanders’ father, Aloysius Hale Sanders but he never received it, as it was tied up in the estate and he died in 1919. She further said that during her grandfather’s lifetime he had been approached many times by Shakespearean societies and individuals who wished to purchase the portrait, but he always refused to part with it, as he considered it his most treasured possession and did not want it to leave the family to which it had always belonged. Thousands of people were present for the public opening of this exhibition in New York.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

A copy of the gift document “Inter Vivo” that Lloyd Sullivan’s grandmother made to his aunt Mary Agnes Hale Sanders, (Uggie). Sullivan’s grandmother gave the portrait to Uggie in 1928 so that Uggie could take it to New York to exhibit it at Stern Bros. Art Gallery starting on Oct.,18th,1928. However, she did not get around to making this gift official until Jan. 16, 1929, when Uggie came back to Montreal after the exhibition. Included in this gallery is a copy of the New York Times article on the exhibit that features the interview with Uggie.

Lloyd Sullivan further states that  “my grandmother said that the family had a copy of the page of this visitors’ book but that it was lost along with a number of boxes of papers in a fire and a flood of some of the Sanders family members’ homes in England. I and a number of others in the family have tried to track down the records of this Swansea Inn in London England but we all drew a blank as it was so long ago (over 400 years)  that there were no records to be found concerning this Inn” (personal correspondence with Daniel Fischlin, 14 March 2011).

Frederick Louis Francis Hales Sanders

Born: July 20, 1888 at West Hampstead, London, England

Baptized: At Cricklewod, District of Hampstead, Greater London Middlesex, England

First Marriage: Laura Campeau in 1922 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Second Marriage: Marguerite Decary on June 3, 1928, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Died: June 11, 1971 in Notre-Dame-de-Grace, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

NOTE: Fred (Frederick) Hale Sanders was Lloyd Sullivan’s mother’s oldest brother who owned the painting in the early 1960s.He lived right across the street from the Sullivan family on Earnscliffe Ave. in NDG, Montreal.  Frederick Hale Sanders was the one who approached Canadian retail giant Eatons in 1964 and arranged for an extended display of the Sanders portrait on the sixth floor of their downtown Montreal store where Eatons had a  collection of paintings on display. He was approached at this time by an art dealer who wanted to buy the portrait for $100,000 but the family prevented Fred from selling it because they thought it was worth much more than. After Fred died in 1971 the portrait was passed on to his sister, Lloyd Sullivan’s mother and thence to Lloyd Sullivan.

Catherine (Kathleen) Clare Sullivan (née Hales Sanders/Saunders)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Kathleen Sullivan, circa 1928; with her mother (Lloyd Sullivan’s grandmother) Agnes Hales Sanders in the 1920s in Montreal.

Born: May 30, 1903 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Baptized: June 9, 1903 at St. Patrick’s Basilica, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Married: Alexander Sullivan on September 6, 1926 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Mother to: Lloyd Alexander Sullivan (only child)

Died: April 14, 1972 in the Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Lloyd Alexander Sullivan

Lloyd_sullivan

Born: April 12, 1933 in Montreal (East), Quebec, Canada

Baptized: May 14, 1933 at Holy Family Catholic Church, Montreal (East), Quebec, Canada

Married: Mary Gertrude Lunney on May 28, 1960 at St.Theresa’s Catholic Church in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

3. Historical Contexts and Notes: The Intermarriage of the Sanders/Saunders Family With Shakespeare’s Relatives

The following genealogical notes reveal, for the first time in detail, the relationship and intermarriage of the Sanders/Saunders family with William Shakespeare’s relatives, including the Throckmortons, Catesbys, Wintours, and Ardens. In addition, the Sanders/Saunders family was related by marriage to John Heminges, Shakespeare’s close friend, colleague, and fellow actor. All these families, being recusant Catholics, were allied by marriage and sympathies with recusant Catholics living in the counties of Warwickshire and Worcestershire in the Midlands of England during Shakespeare’s era under the oppressive rule of Queen Elizabeth I.

This outline is based, as mentioned earlier, on the work of British genealogist and antiquarian Pamela J. Hinks, who has followed a trail that begins with Sanders Portrait owner Lloyd Sullivan and leads back into the heart of Shakespeare’s social and familial affiliations. It is important to underline that Mr. Sullivan’s genealogy lead directly to Shakespeare’s immediate social location in Elizabethan England. This genealogical research makes for a remarkable provenance for the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare.

No other portrait associated with Shakespeare has this sort of direct family-based provenance or genealogy. The notes below are intended as a partial historical explication and contextualization of the main line of the Sanders family trunk published above by the Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare (CASP) site.

For an abbreviated version of the genealogical chart and interrelationships by affinity and not sanguinity, click below; this gallery also contains a chart showing the known owners of the Sanders portrait as it was passed down through the generations.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 Watch this portion of the site as we continue to release key documents and images associated with the main line of the Sanders family genealogy.

The Throckmorton and Catesby Families

Dorothy Sanders (in the Sanders/Saunders hereditary line) was born in 1574 at the village of Charlewood in the Midlands of England. She married Sir John Throckmorton in 1594. John was born in 1572 at Lincolnshire into the family of Sir Richard Charles Acton Throckmorton. Dorothy and John settled in the village of Coughton in Warwickshire, England.

These two staunch recusant Catholic families (Sanders and Throckmortons) lived within 10 miles of each other and it was customary in those days for Catholic families to intermarry as they did not move their residences very often or travel very far because the only mode of transportation was by foot, horse, or buggy. At that time, government permission had to be obtained for any appreciable amount of travel across the country.

Thomas Catesby (b. 1479 and d. 1532) married Elizabeth Saunders in 1509. Elizabeth was born at Sibberoft, England in 1486.  Elizabeth was the daughter of Thomas Saunders (of the Sanders/Saunders hereditary line) of Sibberoft. Thomas Catesby was an ancestor of the notorious Robert Catesby, the mastermind of the failed gunpowder plot of 1605.

Sir William Catesby was born in 1547 in Ashby St. Ledgers, Northamptonshire, England. He died in April 1598 in Ashby St. Ledgers. On June 9, 1566, at Ashby St. Ledgers, William married Anne Throckmorton, daughter of Sir Robert Throckmorton (major Catholic recusant family from Coughton) and his wife, Elizabeth Hussey. Anne Throckmorton was born in 1548 and died at Ashby St. Ledgers in 1605. William and Anne’s son Robert was the mastermind of the failed Gunpowder Plot.

Robert Catesby was born in 1572. He was the only surviving son of Sir William Catesby and Anne Throckmorton. Robert married Catherine Leigh in 1593, the daughter of Sir Thomas Leigh of Stoneleigh, Warwickshire. Robert Catesby and other recusant Catholics hoped that the accession of James I to the throne would bring an end to the oppression and persecution of Catholics in England under Elizabeth I, but they were sadly disappointed.

Robert planned the Gunpowder Plot and was the leader of a group of provincial Catholics including Robert and Thomas Wintour, John Wright, Thomas Percy, Guy Fawkes and others. It was Robert Catesby who hired Guy Fawkes, a military expert in gunpowder, to lead the conspirators to attempt to blow up the parliament buildings and King James I in 1605. The attempt failed and Robert Catesby died in a raid lead by the Sheriff of Worcester and his men on Holbeche House, Staffordshire (owned by the Littletons, a recusant Catholic family). The remaining conspirators were eventually arrested, tried and executed for high treason.

The Wintour Family

Robert (b. 1568) and Thomas Wintour (b. 1571) were sons of George Wintour of Huddington Court in Worcestershire in the midlands of England and his wife Jane, daughter of Sir William Ingleby of Ripley Castle near Knareborough. Their paternal grandparents were Robert Wintour (senior) of Cavewell in Gloucestershire and his wife Catherine Throckmorton, daughter of Sir George Throckmorton of Coughton in Warwickshire. Robert and Thomas were conspirators in the gunpowder plot along with Robert Catesby. They were born and raised in Huddington, which is 7 miles from Coughton (Throckmorton family home) and 13 miles from Worcester (Sanders/Saunders home).

Huddington_court_

Huddington Court (home to the Wintour Family)

Catherine Throckmorton was an aunt of Mary Arden, Shakespeare’s mother.
As scions of the Throckmortons, they could therefore claim a kinship with the gunpowder plotters like Robert Catesby (leader) and his cousin Francis Tresham. Their maternal uncle Francis Ingleby, a Catholic priest, was executed at York in 1586, a fact that could hardly have failed to leave a stark impression upon the Wintour family. A faithful Catholic, Robert Wintour was married to Gertrude Talbot, daughter of the staunch Catholic recusant John Talbot of Grafton. John Talbot’s lawyer in 1584 was John Sanders’ (senior) father, Richard Sanders, of the Sanders/Saunders family hereditary line living in Upton-Warren, Worcestershire, in the Midlands of England.

Robert Wintour inherited the Tudor Huddington Court near Worcester along with a significant fortune with which he was known to be generous. Under Robert, Huddington Court became a known refuge for priests. Both Robert and his younger brother Thomas joined the gunpowder plotters, but the conspiracy failed and upon the arrest and tortured confession of Guy Fawkes, they were convicted and executed in 1606 for high treason as was customary for traitors of the crown.

The Arden and Shakespeare Families

 Mary Arden, Shakespeare’s mother was born in 1537 in Wilmcote, Warwickshire in the midlands of England. She died at Stratford-upon-Avon in 1608. Mary was the youngest and favorite of eight daughters of Robert Arden (b.? d. 1556). Robert was a member of the noble Catholic family of Ardens of Park Hill, Warwickshire. Mary’s wealthy family home was called Glebe Farm, a two-storey Wilmcote farmstead (Wilmcote was situated about 8 miles from Stratford-upon-Avon) and close to Worcester (home of the Sanders/Saunders) in Worcestershire in the Midlands of England.

Mary married John Shakespeare in her parish church of St. John the Baptist at Aston Cantlow in late 1557. John Shakespeare’s father, Richard was a tenant farmer of Robert Arden, Mary’s father from Wilmcote. Mary and John moved to Henley Street in Stratford-upon-Avon, which was conveniently near the market. John used the skins ofanimals from his father’s farm to set up trade as a glover and whittawer (maker of saddles, harnesses and fine gloves).

John Shakespeare became an important official in Stratford, being elected Chamberlain in 1561, alderman in 1565 and then mayor of Stratford in 1568. John and Mary had eight children between 1558-1580. William Shakespeare was the third of the eight children, three of whom died in infancy of the plague.

Edward Arden was born in 1542 at Park Hall, Castle Bromwich, an estate in the north–western part of Warwickshire, England. He was an English nobleman and head of the staunch Catholic Arden Family who kept a priest, Hugh Hall at their house disguised as a gardener. Edward was a cousin of Mary Arden, William Shakespeare’s mother. In 1552, Edward Arden married Mary Throckmorton (daughter of Sir Robert Throckmorton of the influential and staunch Catholic family from Coughton, Warwickshire). Edward Arden became the high sheriff of Warwickshire in 1575.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Harvington Hall is a moated medieval and Elizabethan manor-house south-east of Kidderminster (approximately fifteen miles north of Worcester city centre). The Elizabethan House was built in the 1580s by Humphrey Pakington, an important recusant from this period. On his death it was inherited by his daughter Mary, Lady Yate. In 1644 it was pillaged by Roundhead troops. In 1696 the Hall passed to the recusant Throckmorton family of Coughton Court in Warwickshire, who owned it until 1923. The priest-holes were built in the time of Humphrey Pakington, when it was high treason for a Catholic priest to be in England. The hiding places at Harvington are the finest surviving series in England, and four of them, all sited round the Great Staircase, show the trademarks of the master builder of such places, Nicholas Owen, who was at work from 1588 onwards. Harvington Hall is one of the few present Catholic communities in England that dates back to the sixteenth century including the days of Mary Tudor and the persecution of Elizabeth 1. The moated manor house  was one of the important undercover Catholic retreats maintained through out the Penal Days  by the recusant Pakington and Throckmorton families. The old Catholic family of Hales occupied the Hall Farm in late Victorian times with three generations being buried in St Mary’s Church yard in the grounds of Harvington Hall. Edward had a sister Frances Teresa, who was a professed lay sister in the convent of Augustinian canonesses in Paris and who died in 1835 at the age of 76. Edward farmed the 275 acre land on the behalf of Sir William Throckmorton, he employed seven labourers and a young boy and also four servants. In 1780 Edward Hales is recorded as a recusant and servant to Mr Thomas Wall. Harvington, in other words, is an important locale associated with the Sanders family history and its association with recusant Catholics.

Edward and Mary’s daughter Margaret, married John Somerville from the village of Edstone near Stratford-upon-Avon. John Somerville was a fanatical recusant Catholic, who hatched a plan to assassinate Queen Elizabeth I, but was arrested long before he could attempt it. A purge of Edward Arden’s household ensued (based on John Somerville’s tortured confession) and Edward’s wife Mary, their daughter, Margaret (Somerville’s wife), and the priest, Hugh Hall, were arrested and brought to the Tower of London.

Only Edward Arden and John Somerville were convicted of treason. Edward’s wife Mary, their daughter Margaret and the priest, Hugh Hall remained in prison but they were eventually released. John committed suicide in his cell the night before he was to be executed. Edward Arden pleaded innocent but was executed in December of 1583.

The Heminges Family

 John Heminges (William Shakespeare’s friend, colleague and fellow actor) was born and raised in the village of Droitwich, Worcestershire, England, (6 miles from Worcester, home of the Sanders/Saunders family). John was baptized on November 25, 1566. His family sent him to London at twelve years of age to become an apprentice to James Collins, a London grocer.
John Heminges became an actor and financial manager of the Chamberlain’s Men, which upon the accession of James I to the throne of England, became known as William Shakespeare’s company of actors called the King’s Men. John Heminges is famous for being the joint editor (with Henry Condell), of the First Folio, a collection of Shakespeare’s plays. In the First Folio, John Heminges and Henry Condell stated that they published the Folio “only to keep the memory of so worthy a Friend and Fellow alive, as was our Shakespeare, by humble offer of his plays”.

John Heminges’ connection to the hereditary line of the Sanders/Saunders family was established when Phillipi Sanders (of the Sanders/Saunders hereditary lineage) married Anna Heminges, John Heminges’ first cousin, on April 25, 1592 at the village of Ombersley, Worcestershire, England.

Conclusion

The foregoing reveals that the Sanders/Saunders family intermarried with William Shakespeare’s relatives, the Throckmortons and the Catesbys, who were related by marriage to the Wintours and the Ardens, (Mary Arden being Shakespeare’s mother). In addition, the Sanders/Saunders family was related by marriage to John Heminges, Shakespeare’s close friend, colleague, and fellow actor. All these families had much in common, being recusant Catholics from neighboring towns and villages in the Midlands of England.

Documentation shows that members of both the Shakespeare and Sanders families were listed in the church wardens’ presentments in the seventeenth century in Rowington (Warwickshire).

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Rowington Manor (Rowington, County of Warwick, some ten miles north of Stratford), owned by John Sanders Esq. A 31 January 1721 document involving a court action between John Sanders and Thomas Tibbatts lists gen. William Shakespeare as a jury member. The document is another in a lengthy list of such documents in which the Sanders and the Shakespeare families are shown to have relations of various sorts, business, legal, or other.

A book on Worcestershire (including Warwickshire) recusants states that “Despite Charles II’s sympathetic attidude towards Catholics they were still counted, and their names recorded in the diocesan recusancy rolls if they did not attend the parish church. In 1664 21 persons, including members of the Betham, Atwood, Reeve, Shakespeare and Sanders families were listed in the church wardens presentments.” These families had a long association with recusancy in this area of England that extends well back into Shakespeare’s own lifetime. The Records of Rowington (Vol. 2) lists multiple instances of both the Sanders and the Shakespeare families’ activities in the area (click on the file below to access these):

Churchwardens’ presentments involved reports to the Bishop relating parishoners’ wrongdoings or problems in the parish. In making presentments, churchwardens were anxious to show that they had not been negligent in their duties. One of the most common offences was absence from church, which was easy to report. Within this category came recusants. A recusant was anyone who frequently absented themselves from Sunday service in church––the term was also used generally to refer specifically to ‘papists’  (Roman Catholics). This might be prosecuted by indictment, but more often by presentment to either secular or ecclesiastical courts.  Such prosecutions were increasingly rare after the 1688 Revolution, which brought limited toleration for religious non-conformists.

It was customary in Shakespeare’s era for Catholic families to intermarry within their hometowns and villages or neighbouring communities. This was as much a function of religious and community affiliations as it was of limited access to transportation and government travel restrictions. The latter, for obvious political and safety reasons, prohibited extensive journeys across the country without permission.

The main trunk of the Sanders family tree published above, along with the contexts provided by these notes, combined with the successful results of thirteen scientific tests carried out on the Sanders portrait, conclusively support the Sanders/Saunders families claim that their ancestor, John Sanders, was related to William Shakespeare (through affinity) and knew him as a result of their shared social and cultural contexts. John Sanders, or a close relation of his, was able to gain Shakespeare’s confidence and consent to paint his portrait for posterity, and to record important personal details of his life and death on the linen label on the back of the portrait. What is so significant about this, is that Shakespeare biographers and historians did not publish these pertinent details until 1773, many years after they had been recorded on the back of the Sanders portrait in the early 1600s.

To repeat: no other painting of Shakespeare can claim such a provenance nor such an overwhelming amount of evidence that directly links the portrait––by genealogy, by internal and external evidence associated with the portrait itself, and by rigourous scientific testing––with Shakespeare and his immediate cultural and social milieu.

NOTE: Authorship and Methodology of the Sanders Portrait: Genealogy and Provenance
This page has been co-authored by Daniel Fischlin, Pamela J. Hinks, and Lloyd Sullivan.
The methodology used to compile its contents has included extensive  genealogical work in church and state registries in England, in the International Genealogical Index (IGI), and in site-specific locales related to the genealogy. Significant contextual and interpretive work has been done in primary and secondary historical sources. Finally, key components of this genealogy rely on family lore and history particular to the Sanders family: every effort has been made to verify this information and where ongoing research continues we have indicated that this is the case. Readers who spot errors on the site or who have further information to add to the site can click here to have corrections or additions made. The authors wish to thank the many people who have contributed information including, in particular, Tim Hinks and James Hale-Sanders.

John_sanders_bapt


Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare: Reception History

The flow of new scientific and genealogical information related to the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare escalated dramatically in the period dating from 2001-2011. Along with major exhibits at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in London as part of the Gallery’s 150th anniversary in 2006, the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO), Yale University (Yale Center for British Art), and the Macdonald Stewart Art Gallery at the University of Guelph (which featured a six-month Shakespeare Made in Canada exhibit with the Sanders Portrait as its centrepiece), the new information surrounding the Sanders portrait’s contexts has also prompted an increasing number of major theatrical figures and scholars to comment on it.

Below is a short listing of some of these comments drawn from a wide range of published sources (that include Vanity Fair, the New York Times, the Globe & Mail, the London Sunday Times), the acclaimed Anne Henderson 2008 film “Battle of Wills” (which has had major TV airplay on Bravo and in French Canada), scholarly conferences and journals, blogs, and gallery-goer comments written into guestbooks at major art galleries.


Actor and star of Academy Award winning film Shakespeare in Love, Joseph Fiennes, on the Sanders Portrait (excerpt from Anne Henderson’s documentary Battle of Wills).

The range of national and international media coverage of the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare’s claims, along with the  investigative journalism and critical opinion pieces, that have emerged over the last 3 years, is exceptional. Some of the most eminent publications globally have taken a sustained and active interest in the Sanders and, it should be underlined, not one has found a whit of evidence to the contrary regarding the claims it has to authenticity, neither in terms of provenance nor in terms of the science performed on the actual object nor in terms of the internal evidence found in the portrait itself.

The comments cited below, aside from their pertinence to debates on authenticity, point to the Sanders Portrait as having a major ongoing place in the legacy of portraiture associated with Shakespeare. No future discussion of Shakespeare’s image painted in his own historical moment will be complete without reference to the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare.

Moreover, over and above its survival for over 400 years in one family’s possession, and its astonishing journey into its current context, its remarkably accomplished aesthetics make it a stand-alone and utterly unique example of Elizabethan/Jacobean portaiture with significant cultural and historical value. This is especially so in its Canadian context, where the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare stands as an exceptional, sui generis, artefact associated with Canada’s distinct cultural heritage and Canada’s historic relations to its colonial contexts.

1. Comments by well-known actors concerning the Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare

• Two well-known actors, Canadian star Gordon Pinsent and Academy Award winner Kevin Spacey, had just finished filming the movie “The Shipping News” in Newfoundland when they heard about the Sanders painting on display at the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO). Pinsent and Spacey changed their flight plans, and instead of returning to  Hollywood flew directly to Toronto to view the Sanders portrait.

The following are their comments written in the Art Gallery of Ontario’s (AGO) guestbook on June 22, 2001:

• Gordon Pinsent:

“Very convincing. That does it for me. Thank you!  Thank you!  Thank you!”

• Kevin Spacey:

“We simply want it to be him. He looks as one would expect. Bemused and mischievous.”

2. Newspaper and Magazine Quotes

• “This is what we want Shakespeare to look like. The man who wrote these plays had a staggering imagination. This portrait makes Shakespeare look like a bohemian, an artist and not a prosperous businessman. We see somebody full of life, someone who is roguish, with a twinkle in his eye.”

––Richard Monette, former Artistic Director of the Stratford Festival. Quoted in “Is This a Picture of Shakespeare We See Before Us?” New York Times, May 28, 2001.

•“The combination of family provenance and lore, the actual scientific testing on all components of the physical aspects of the portrait are consistent,” [Daniel] Fischlin said.

“And now, remarkably,” he continued, “the direct line of Sanders back through Lloyd Sullivan’s maternal ancestry takes us directly into the heart of Shakespeare country with multiple family connections between the Sanders and Shakespeare’s immediate cultural milieu. No other portrait even comes close to this array of evidence, however circumstantial.” Exploring the origins of the portrait, he added, is important because it helps bring more clarity to Shakespeare’s life — his personal interactions and the historical context in which he lived and worked.“The Sanders portrait and its genealogy gets deep into these contexts and reveals an array of interactions and local histories that matter because they shed so much light on some of the key aspects of the early modern period that gave shape to our own historical contexts,” he said.

It is clear that the portrait is worth a great deal of money, but that detail is not as important as “knowing that no future discussion of Shakespeare’s image and history will be complete without reference to the Sanders portrait and its history,” he said.

“I’m very much hoping that a Canadian collector or institution will have the foresight to acquire the portrait and make it accessible in a proper public and pedagogical environment,” said Fischlin, who has been involved in the investigation for about eight years.

––Rob O’Flanagan, “Authenticity claim grows for Bard portrait,” The Guelph Mercury, March 18, 2011

• “This image allows us to relate the man to the humor, comedy and mischief in his work. He’s actually wearing a bit of a smirk, all of which makes the portrait very tempting.”

––Professor Alexander Leggatt, University of Toronto, quoted in “Is This a Picture of Shakespeare We See Before Us?” New York Times, May 28, 2001.

• “The London art dealer Angus Neill represents the Sanders portrait in Britain. In the film, he makes his argument against the Chandos, a portrait that is fast losing ground. He describes the Cobbe as “a highly polished and accomplished portrait of a nobleman, but completely lacking the ‘spiritual power’ of the Sanders, which I can only describe as the Mona Lisa of Elizabethan portraiture”. Neill’s love affair with the Sanders began when he saw the image as he flicked through a magazine while waiting for a train: “I nearly fainted. When I went to the NPG show, the Sanders knocked everything else off the wall.”

––Quoted from Christine Finn, “Desperately Seeking Shakespeare,” The Sunday Times, March 22, 2009

•  “But as Daniel Fischlin observes: ‘Not one claim about the Sanders portrait has been reasonably rebutted by experts. The only thing I’ve heard in direct rebuttal is [Tarnya] Cooper’s … naive and impressionistic claim [made in 2002 and again in 2006] that the Sanders isn’t Shakespeare because the sitter does not appear to be 39. … No other Shakespeare image has had this level of scrutiny and evidence that has been tested very publicly in all sorts of ways with still no argument worthy of mention to knock it down.’”

––Quoted from James Adams, “Ottawa portrait owner is the Bard’s kin,” The Globe & Mail, April 11, 2009

• “He is mischievous, keen-eyed, and almost flirtatious. Half twinkle, half smirk, he looks out from his portrait with a tolerant, world-weary air. This is Shakespeare. Perhaps you thought you knew him: bald pate, thin brows, stiff white ruff. You thought wrong.”

––Stephanie Nolen, Globe & Mail, “Portrait piques world interest,” May 12, 2001

• “It’s a wonderfully romantic portrait. He looks amused and amusing and intelligent, just the way we’d rather like Shakespeare to look.”

––Professor Anne Lancashire, University of Toronto

• “The Sanders portrait puts a human face on English literature.”

––Professor Alexander Leggatt, University of Toronto

• “The very breeziness with which (the Sanders) tucked (the portrait) under beds and in closets argues profound certainty. That rather perfunctory label hints at a mind which accepted the sitter’s identity because it had already become a tradition, a given, something understood.”

––Murrough O’Brien, The Independent, March 23, 2003

• “It’s a quite persuasive painting. It’s a quite different Shakespeare from what we’re used to … and there’s nothing wrong with that.”

––Quote in a Reuters News story, Thursday, May 24, 2001 by Stephen Orgel, Professor in Humanities at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California

• The Sanders portrait, dating from Shakespeare’s lifetime, is the most unconventional and emotionally appealing of the contenders for his true likeness: it shows somebody akin to the character played by Joseph Fiennes in the film Shakespeare in Love. The hair and eye color match a description of Shakespeare that has been attributed to Christopher Marlowe.”

–– Report by Christopher Hudson, Scotland’s Sunday Times, Feb. 5, 2006

• In a piece on Shakespearean portraiture, Adam Gopnik, an art critic with The New Yorker, opines that the Sanders Portrait is  “even better-credentialled” than the Cobbe but “never got what the political writers like to call ‘traction’ … its [the Sanders’] wood [is] securely dated to the early seventeenth century, [and it] also shows a good-looking rock-star Shakespeare—though the Sanders looks less like George in ’67 and more like Dylan on the cover of “New Morning,” a shaggy guy with a wry smile—and has every bit as good a provenance as the new one, and a better direct claim: there’s a slip of paper, securely dated to the period, on the back of the thing that once read, in part, ‘Shakespere…this likeness taken 1603’ … And the Canadian portrait shows a guy who, though not yet bald, is unmistakably going bald.

So the real takeaway ought to be that, if this [the Cobbe] is a new portrait of Shakespeare, it would probably have to date earlier than the date they’re giving. Or else, as Ben Jonson said, that we ought to look “not on his picture, but his book.” Or, best of all, just trust Canada.

–– Article by Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker, March 12, 2009

• “What strikes us most about it is the face itself, the emotional content, the character in it. He’s half smiling. He’s looking at you, but not looking at you. He has a very alluring, sly, perhaps mischievous kind of appearance. The actor’s virtue is in his face … the real prop in this painting isn’t a prop at all. It’s the face. I think this is an actor’s face. I think in painting this, that’s what the painter was trying to tell us. This is not the face of anybody else but an actor. Who else would want to look like that?”

–– Prof. Robert Tittler quoted in a Concordia University Report, on March 28, 2002 

• “The Sanders portrait by contrast, brims with life. The sitter is 39 years old … certainly he looks it; his hairline is receding, with a pronounced widow’s peak, though he is not yet fully bald in front as in the Droeshout engraving and the tomb effigy. There are soft hints of laugh lines around the blue-grey eyes, which twinkle with subtle merriment. The small mouth turns up in a gentle smile, as though he were just about to share a cracking good tale (and probably quite a bawdy one) with the viewer … (The) Sanders (Portrait), by resisting it, has succeeded in giving us what the others could not: a fully human image of Shakespeare the man. What All the other portraits of Shakespeare have in common, besides their reliance on the basic template of the Droeshout engraving, is a preternatural solemnity that attempts to romanticize Shakespeare, but succeeds only in rendering him dreadfully gloomy and ultimately banal. I think it really is him. The clothes, the hair, the face, the expression—they all tally with his biographical details and the milieus he moved in.”

––Poet Sabina Becker, June 24, 2006

• “His hair is soft and lively, receding, unconcerned…lips touching skin drooping slightly under quick, mirthful eyes – the effect as a whole is captivating.”

––Kate Foster, The Antigonish Review, Issue 135

• In an interesting presentation at the Toronto Reference Library on Feb. 09, 2010 entitled CSI: Shakespeare: Investigating the Portraits of William Shakespeare, Dr. Jane Freeman put thumbs down on almost all of the portraits of Shakespeare except one. The only one she thinks has a real chance of being Shakespeare is the Sanders portrait which she says “has passed all the tests so far, and is Canadian too boot!”

––Professor Jane Freeman, Director of English Language Writing Support, School of Graduate Studies, University of Toronto, and member of the Board of Governors, Stratford ’s Shakespeare Festival

• An international conference entitled “Wartime Shakespeare in a Global Context” was organized and hosted by the University of Ottawa, September 18-20, 2009. The opening of the conference was held at the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa with the unveiling of the Sanders portrait which was featured in a month long exhibition at the Museum.

Professor Dr. Irena Makaryk, University of Ottawa, Vice Dean at the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies chaired the organizing committee and hosted the conference.

Mark O’Neill, Director-General, Canadian War Museum and Vice-President, Canadian Museum of Civilization Corporation, opened the conference with the President of the University of Ottawa, Allan Rock, unveiling the Sanders portrait of Shakespeare, which went on exhibition for a month at the museum.

 Both Dr. Irena Makaryk and Mark O’Neill support the Sanders portrait.

• David Loch, owner and president of Loch Galleries (Toronto, Winnipeg, Calgary), is a strong supporter of the Sanders portrait and firmly believes in its authenticity. “I have held the Chandos portrait of Shakespeare in my hands and it left me stone cold. On the other hand, I have held the Sanders portrait in my hands and I had emotions and feelings coming out all over.”

––David Loch, documentary film, “Battle of Wills” about the the Sanders portrait saga.

3. Vanity Fair Feature

In 2001, when the Sanders portrait first attracted international attention, the American magazine “Vanity Fair” ran a full-page color photo of the painting in its December 2001 issue (pp. 282-83). The photo appeared opposite a corresponding one-page essay by the literary critic and Shakespeare scholar Harold Bloom, Sterling Professor of Humanites at Yale University.

Referring specifically to the Sanders portrait, Harold Bloom remarks on its “splendour” and states: “Why do we care what Shakespeare looked like? The traditional portraits of him have no particular authority, I prefer this one, since it is livelier.”

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

4. Costume and Hairstyle

Jenny Tiramani, Director of Theatre Design at Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London, England analyzed the clothing and hairstyle of the sitter in the Sanders portrait. After exhaustive study and research, a team of experts led by Tiramani, confirmed that the sitter’s clothing and hairstyle in the portrait are wholly consistent with the 1603 date of the Sanders portrait as well as for for someone of William Shakespeare’s rank and social status in that historical moment.

It is important to recognize that, in addition to the scientific and genealogical evidence that strongly favour the Sanders Portrait, the internal evidence associated with the image itself is wholly consistent, and recognized as such by one of the leading contemporary experts in Elizabethan and Jacobean costume and clothing with a vast experience in the area.

From close study of the internal evidence that the Sanders Portrait presents, Tiramani concludes, “The Sanders Portrait certainly shows a man appearing exactly as Shakespeare might have chosen to be painted to mark the occasion of becoming a royal servant [to James I in 1603]” (52).

In the documentary film, “Battle of Wills,” Ms. Tiramini states that there is very good reason to believe that the sitter in the Sanders portrait is, indeed, William Shakespeare.

––Tiramani’s findings are published in the Journal of the Costume Society of London, (2005, Number 39). Click on the gallery below to view the full article with images.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

5. Blog Interview and Commentary

Respected Canadian documentarian filmmaker Anne Henderson, in an online blog interview, notes how in making her film “Battle of Wills” she encountered resistance from the Shakespeare establishment:

“The resistance I encountered was not from the film financing agencies, but from the Shakespeare establishment centered in Stratford and the National Portrait Gallery in London. There is a huge amount of money generated by licensing images of Shakespeare; in addition, I think there is a desire to control interpretations and some scholars are guarding their academic turf. I suspect that if the Sanders portrait emerged from Earl So-and-so’s collection (as opposed to a Canadian family’s), it would have been taken more seriously! Which of course brings us to the newly-discovered Cobbe portrait, owned by an aristocratic Anglo-Irish family. I was aware of the research being done on this image for some time. The Cobbe is backed by the same Stratford scholars mentioned above. There are many problems with the image, not the least of which is that it is supposed to show Shakespeare at 46, and yet the sitter has a full head of hair! I’m hoping to deal with the Cobbe in a longer film in the future.”

For the full interview with Anne Henderson click here.

For a recent magazine feature from Point of View on Battle of Wills in which Henderson discusses key aspects of the academic struggle over Shakespeare’s image, click below:

For a short extract from “Battle of Wills” featuring Joseph Fiennes click here.

Note that pre-eminent British art historian Sir Roy Strong (former Director of the Victoria and Albert Museum and the National Portrait Gallery in London) branded the claims made by chairman of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust and editor of the Oxford Shakespeare Stanley Wells and art collector and restorer Alec Cobbe about the Cobbe to be “codswallop” in The Observer (London April 19, 2009, p. 10).

For further information on the Cobbe’s debunking click here.

As reported in The Guardian “revered Oxford Shakespeare expert [and biographer] Katherine Duncan-Jones, remains bemused by Wells’s view. ‘It is so irrational, I don’t know how to describe it,’ she said. ‘He and Cobbe are evoking some long-held tradition of ascribing these portraits as Shakespeare without saying how or why'” (Vanessa Thorpe, “A portrait of William Shakespeare? ‘Codswallop’ says expert” Sunday 19 April 2009 The Guardian). Duncan-Jones has made it clear that the so-called Cobbe is likely an image of Sir Thomas Overbury. Writing in the Sunday Times she states,

An authentic portrait of Sir Thomas Overbury (1581–1613) was bequeathed to the Bodleian Library in Oxford in 1740. This picture bears a startling resemblance to the “Cobbe” painting (and its companions). Features such as a distinctive bushy hairline, and a slightly malformed left ear that may once have borne the weight of a jewelled earring, appear identical. Even the man’s beautifully intricate lace collar, though not identical in pattern, shares overall design with “Cobbe”, having square rather than rounded corners.

The way in which the Cobbe has been shamelessly promoted as Shakespeare flies in the face of all the extant scholarship on the image conducted in the 1960s by Sir David Piper, and the strong probablity that it is an image of Overbury. Between 1964 and 1985, Piper directed three of Britain’s finest museums, the National Portrait Gallery in London, the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, and the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge. He served an 18-year apprenticeship at the National Portrait Gallery before becoming its Director. His expertise and scholarship in the portraiture of this period remain unimpugned and completely unchallenged by any evidence-based argument.

The sumptuary coding alone of the Cobbe’s sitter’s dress is aristocratic and virtually assures that the sitter is not and could never have been Shakespeare––so in contravention would a portrait of him in this sort of dress have been with acceptable practice. For the Shakespearean elitists who hope for a Shakespeare as an exemplary personification of upper class values (and thus in concert with their own bourgeois, elite values) this is the perfect image: a “class” fantasy or elite consensual hallucination.

Arbitrary assignation of Shakespeare’s identity to the Cobbe portrait––without appropriate provenance, without appropriate close reading of the semiotics of the actual image (in terms of its key signifiers), and with nary a single connection to Shakespeare except the most circumstantial, the most arbitrary and roundabout––suggest that the Cobbe is more about self-promotion and the economic benefits of ownership of Shakespeare’s iconic capital than about historical verity.

Recent displays of the Cobbe in any relation to Shakespeare, and perhaps captializing on the dictum that “any publicity is good publicity,” severely undermine the curatorial integrity of the institutions associated with these displays.


Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare: A Summary of the Latest Arguments In Support of Its Authenticity

Sanders Portrait of Shakespeare: A Summary of the Latest Arguments In Support of Its Authenticity

In ongoing correspondence (dating back to January 2011) with Sanders portrait owner Lloyd Sullivan, CASP Director and University Research Chair Daniel Fischlin prepared the following summary of the current situation with regard to the Sanders portrait laying claim to being the only authentic portrait of Shakespeare painted during his lifetime.

At the present time, there are only three portraits that claim to be true-life images of Shakespeare, namely the Chandos, the Cobbe, and the Sanders. Of these, only the Sanders portrait has overwhelming evidence in favor of its authenticity. The evidence of the authenticity in favor of the Sanders portrait far outweighs the evidence of the other two portraits.

The following points need iteration:

1. The owners of the Chandos portrait, the National Portrait Gallery (NPG), have an abundant amount of funds and contacts to promote their portrait and have been doing so for hundreds of years with no evidence (not a single document associating it with Shakespeare) and no competition until now. Their sponsored exhibition “Searching for Shakespeare” in 2006 gave them a golden opportunity to produce evidence to support their claim of authenticity. This they did by claiming that the date of execution of the Chandos portrait was really 1600 not the historical date more traditionally associated with the Chandos of 1610. In 1610, Shakespeare was 46 yrs. old yet the image in the Chandos does not look this old but rather looks like a man in his late twenties or early thirties. For years this was the main criticism against the Chandos portrait.

But they now claim that the Chandos was really painted in 1600 when Shakespeare was 36, thereby making the image more acceptable.

Also, the NPG now claim that the historical painter of the Chandos was really Joseph Taylor, the well-known actor in Shakespeare’s company of actors and not the historic little known painter-stainer John Taylor. When questioned about these new claims, Tarnya Cooper, NPG curator could not and did not provide any new evidence to support these claims and instead said on the BBC TWO’s TV show that it was their  “best guess” that the Chandos portrait is a true-life image of William Shakespeare. It is evident that the NPG’s new claims were made to cause the art world to believe that there is new evidence in support of the authenticity for the Chandos portrait, when in reality there isn’t. This whole story needs to be examined in relation to the status of the NPG and its promotion of an image with a dubious provenance, an imagwe that has been overpainted, and an image that is stylistically not Elizabethan but more late Jacobean or later (i.e. very probably executed after Shakespeare’s death but not of Shakespeare).

2. Similarly, the Cobbe portrait is really the Janssen portrait and is not a portrait of Shakespeare at all but rather a portrait of Thomas Overbury. A study conducted by the Folgers Library in the mid 1940s, I believe, proved this beyond a doubt. Also, the NPG confirmed this and dismissed the Janssen (Cobbe) portrait in their research for the “Searching for Shakespeare” exhibition held at the NPG in London, England in 2006. The owners of the Cobbe portrait led by Stanley Wells are well funded and have the necessary contacts through Mr. Wells and his chairmanship of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust to promote their deception throughout the world of art. The greatest living expert on Elizabethan portraiture, Sir Roy Strong, the former Director of the NPG, has publicly called (and  this is very uncharacteristic of Strong, who is a discrete and sober individual) Wells’s claims about the Cobbe “codswallop.”

3. The Sanders portrait is Canadian-owned and as best can be determined is associated with Lloyd Sullivan’s tenth great grandfather, John Sanders (Senior or JS1) who, as best evidence seems to suggest, was closely tied to Shakespeare and his inner circle of friends, affiliates, and business associates (a relation that extends beyond his generation and into his son’s). It is the only painting of the three that is directly labeled as a portrait of Shakespeare (with a label, ink and glue all consistent with the portrait’s date of 1603). Both the Chandos and the Cobbe portraits are not dated and not signed and their images are not identified on the portraits––the Sanders portrait has both a date and Shakespeare’s name spelled as “Shakspere, the way he signed most of his personal documents.

The Sanders portrait has had 13 arms-length scientific tests successfully carried out on it including forensic tests on the ink on the label on the back of the portrait, which dates it to the 17th century and the period after Shakespeare’s death (from 1616 to about 1650). These tests were independent and conducted by some of the most prominent and respected labs and researchers in their respective fields of expertise including the Canadian Conservation Institute. Moreover, recent genealogical research has discovered that the Sanders family is related to Shakespeare’s relatives including––the Ardens, Throckmortons, and the Catesbys––and to the playwright’s friends and intimates, especially the Heminges and Wintors.

The Sanders portrait is unfairly being held by so-called art and academic experts in the world (mostly British) to a much higher standard of proof than the British portraits. The Sanders portrait has been funded privately on a modest budget and is in serious need of an appropriate level of ongoing support commensurate with the support being provided to the other two portraits, both of which have enormous institutional backing even though their claims are weak and extremely suspect.

The 2013 trip I undertook to London and the Midlands to retrace and double-check all of the family relations, and also to explore the actual urban topography associated with Shakespeare’s social network (research that only a small handful of people have actually undertaken) confirmed that the Sanders family is entirely implicated in the Shakespeare story with significant overlaps evident both in the Midlands and in London proper.

Moreover, as a result of the conference I organized in November 2013 at he Munk Centre, it appears that we have struck on another new line of research that has significant implications for identifying the actual painter and the workshop from which the painting emerged. This research will require more effort but essentially we have the name of the painter or painters, place of the workshop and print-shop where it may have been painted, multiple portraits associated with the workshop, a clear linkage between the owner of the workshop and James I and the court revels (and thus with Shakespeare and his affiliates), and even an apprentice in the workshop married into the Sanders family––all of which appear to point to the probable source of the portrait. Even more astonishing is that the location of this workshop is exactly in the area of early modern London where the Sanders family and Shakespeare and his closest associates lived (all within blocks of each other).

Again, further research is required on this aspect of the portrait’s provenance and how it connects to John Sanders, along with other aspects of the research that will need to unfold in the next while. That said, no other portrait has not only this level of proof but also this level of potential, viable new leads. These will provide us with valuable information about the portrait and with a wholly new set of parallel histories that reveal more about Shakespeare and his time in ways that more conventional research focused on the texts themselves simply cannot.

My main point, then, is that with both the empirical evidence (both scientific and genealogical) that has come forward, there is simply no other contender portrait of Shakespeare with this level of scrutiny and evidence in its favour. As a result the research, legacy, and custodial issues round what happens to the Sanders Portrait next are paramount in the sense that they are literally making history around an object that is extraordinarily unique.

I believe that many, many people would like to see the Sanders portrait remain in Canada in order to preserve its educational and historic (let alone its aesthetic) value as part of a unique legacy bequeathed not only to us but also to our descendants.

The portrait provides a tangible expression of the deep British roots in our collective Canadian history and of the arts and humanities and their importance to Canada generally.

Daniel Fischlin

 

 


Outerspeares: Transcultural / Transmedia Adaptations of Shakespeare: Conference Call For Papers

CALL FOR PAPERS

Outerspeares: Transcultural / Transmedia Adaptations of Shakespeare

The 1st Annual Conference of the Guelph Early Modern Studies Group

University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario – November 1, 2011

Deadline for Proposals: April 1, 2011

Description:

Our globalized, digitized textual environment has truly become, in Shakespearean terms, a “brave new world” of virtual realities, post-/trans- national identities, and unprecedented constructs of communication and meaning that shapeshift transculturally across different media. Ania Loomba suggests that “emerging national/imperial identities in Europe could never be entirely pure, could never successfully erase the long histories of intermingling.” In our contemporary globalized and digitized media environment, the concept of “intermingling” speaks not only to our distant past but also to our sense of our post-national and increasingly virtual future.

As conceptions of the world have changed, so has Shakespeare accommodated new attitudes to culture, cultural negotiations, and emerging forms of human expression. Shakespeare’s continual, pervasive adaptation across an array of cultural contexts and media platforms forces consideration of the ways meaning is assigned to literary texts, and how meaning is located in the particulars of these cultural events. Transcultural, Intercultural, Multicultural and cross-,  mixed-, or transmedia adaptations of Shakespeare reconfigure the relationship between textual autonomy and historical particulars, pushing beyond conventional understandings of the literary event and the complexities of historical time.

This conference explores transcultural and transmedia adaptations of Shakespeare and the Shakespeare effect through a variety of interdisciplinary perspectives, welcoming papers that address the transcultural and/or transdisciplinary aspects of Shakespeare in the contemporary world. Outerspeares focuses on the radical reshaping that multiple forms of media sampling engage to produce new forms of knowledge associated with “wild Shakespeare,” a form of anarchic “engagement with prior texts that cannot be policed and refuses containment.”

Keynote:

The keynote speaker at the conference will be Tom Magill, Director of “Mickey B,” The Educational Shakespeare Company’s innovative adaptation of Macbeth featuring prisoners from Belfast’s Maghaberry Prison, who will screen the film and give a plenary talk. Click here for more information on the film.

  Papers on the following topics are of particular interest:

• Transcultural adaptations of Shakespeare across media platforms (Film, Television, Visual Art, Performance Art, and the like)
• Transmedia Shakespeares with a focus on how Shakespeare has been sampled, appropriated, and transformed in and across a variety of new and old media
• Theorizing the transculturation of Shakespeare
• Shakespeare and the transculturalism of the Global Early Modern Period
• Shakespeare and Media Subcultures (Graphic Novel subcultures, Film Subcultures, etc.)
• Shakespeare and Diaspora
• Any other topic that falls within the conference theme.

Contact:

Send a (maximum)one-page Abstract to conference co-organizer Mark Kaethler at @uoguelph.ca.

Please note any audio/visual equipment required. For more information, use the above contact or visit our conference website, which will be launched in early 2011.

Conference organizers encourage graduate students to submit proposals. A range of events will occur during the conference and conference organizers plan to produce a book based on conference proceedings.

This conference is co-sponsored by the School of English and Theatre Studies, the College of Arts, and the Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project, directed by Dr. Daniel Fischlin.


New interview with CASP Director, Daniel Fischlin: “Parallel Streams”: Sustaining the Digital Commons

In October of 2010 CASP Director Daniel Fischlin met with doctoral student Andrew Bretz (School of English and Theatre Studies) in the CASP offices at the University of Guelph. The full transcript of that interview, in which issues relating to the sustainability of the digital commons are addressed via Fischlin’s experience with the CASP site, appears here.

The interview was conducted by Bretz as  part of a Fall 2010 SHRCC Knowledge Synthesis Grant led by Dr. Susan Brown. Click below to access the full interview with Fischlin.

A .pdf of the full report submitted in December 2010, Lasting Change: Sustaining Digital Scholarship and Culture in Canada, can be accessed by clicking here.  


CASP announces new RSS News Feed

The Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project (CASP) is pleased to have added a new RSS feed to the site. The RSS feed, powered by Posterous, allows for posting of all CASP-related news on a timely basis, including updates to the site, new site features, news about various CASP partnerships and undertakings. Also, the news site has a unique auto-update feature on a secondary news stream carrying global news relating to the search terms, Canada, Canadian, and Shakespeare. This feature allows site-users to access quickly information that’s in the news about all things Canadian and Shakespearean.

CASP gratefully acknowledges the design and advisory work of Arni Mikelsons at Northern Village in facilitating the launch of this new RSS feed. Thanks too to Gordon Auld for his programming insights.

This launch follows on a year’s work to establish a news feed protocol that is workable. In that time a number of items have been missed and these will be more fully posted in the coming weeks. Among these items are the following:

1. CASP welcomes Brazilian Doctoral (ABD) student Erika Vieira (Belo Horizonte) to its offices for a year of study and work on her doctoral dissertation (September 2010). Ms. Vieira is working on a comparative literature thesis entitled Hamlet’s Afterlives: Adaptation and Appropriation in Readings of the Play.

2. CASP implements bug fixes to the literacy game ‘Speare. Many thanks to lead programmer Brad Eccles for the work in 2010 to make these fixes.

3. CASP Director Daniel Fischlin and Sanders Portrait owner Lloyd Sullivan sign in 2009  with Westwood Creative Artists for a co-written book on the Sanders Portrait and the struggle to determine its authenticity.

4. CASP announces new work on the Interactive Folio edition of Romeo and Juliet, the most media-rich and complete online learning resource for the play currently available.

5. CASP Director Daniel Fischlin did interviews and provided research support for two graduate research projects, one at the MA level the other at the PhD level (Stacey Wheal, Univ. of Western Ontario and David Meurer, York University). As a result CASP’s work is  featured in both their dissertations.

6. CASP Director Daniel Fischlin served as an external reviewer on two doctoral dissertations at the University of Toronto in 2009 and 2010 respectively. Both dissertations by Suddhaseel Sen ( The Afterlife of Shakespeare’s Plays: A Study of Cross-Cultural Adaptations into Opera and Film) and James McKinnon (The Dramaturgy of Appropriation: How Canadian Playwrights Use and Abuse Shakespeare and Chekhov), feature research associated with the CASP site.    

7. CASP’s research was featured in a feature-length article that appeared in the  London Sunday Times Culture Magazine, 22.03.09.

8. CASP’s research was featured in a feature-length article by James Adams that appeared in the Globe and Mail, April 11, 2009.

9. CASP’s research was featured in an online feature column by Michael Best in the Shakespeare Newsletter on “Electronic Shakespeares.”

 10. CASP’s research was featured in an online feature Initiatives Promote Video Games in Education by Nathalie Caron in Game Forward July 14, 2009.

 11. In the summer of 2009 CASP Director Daniel Fischlin negotiates the  contract between Lloyd Sullivan and the Canadian War Museum for loan of the Sanders portrait in the Fall of 2009 for the conference Wartime Shakespeare in a Global Context.

 12. CASP continued to track new leads and to develop new sub-pages to the site, including recent work done by a graduate class taught by Daniel Fischlin in Winter 2010. One of these focuses on Shakespeare and Popular Music, a student work-in-progress associated with  the Graduate Colloquium that CASP helped sponsor in the Fall of  2010 on Shakespeare and Popular Music. CASP was pleased to welcome Professor Adam Hansen, author of Shakespeare and Popular Music as a keynote speaker.

 13. CASP remains in contact with numerous primary and secondary school teachers worldwide (most recently in Australia and the U.S.) who use the site (especially the ‘Speare portion of the site) as a teaching aid and resource. We encourage end-users to remain in touch with ideas for improvements, supplements, and new site features.

14. CASP Director Daniel Fischlin edited a special issue of Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriatiion on Canadian Shakespeares (3.1 Fall/Winter 2007) featuring new research  by Mark Fortier, Mark McCutcheon, Jennifer Drouin, Don Moore, Deanne Williams, Ann Wilson, Rod Carley,  Judith Thompson, and Leanore Lieblein.

 


Battle of Wills film playing in Guelph

News Release

March 13, 2009

On Saturday March 28, 2009, 4:00 PM, a Guelph premiere screening of director Anne Henderson’s film, Battle of Wills, will occur at the Bookshelf in downtown Guelph. The film documents the amazing story behind the Sanders portrait, the only documented image of Shakespeare produced in his own lifetime. Participants in the film include Joseph Fiennes, star of Shakespeare in Love; Daniel Fischlin, CASP Founder and Director; Angus Neill, British Art Expert (http://www.felder.co.uk/08shakespeareinfo.htm); Lloyd Sullivan, the Canadian owner of the Sanders Portrait; and many others. CASP played a crucial role in introducing Anne Henderson to Lloyd Sullivan and in helping with seed monies that funded the project as well as research associated with the project. The film opened as the first film in the Montreal Film Festival (FIFA) on Thursday March 12, 2009.

The screening will be followed by a Q&A with Director Anne Henderson; Lloyd Sullivan; and Daniel Fischlin. Cost: General: $10 / Student: $5. Tickets available through the School of English and Theatre Studies at the University of Guelph. A reception will follow the Q&A.

Bow-final


CASP publishes the Virtual Shakespeare Made in Canada Exhibit (VSMIC)

The Shakespeare–Made in Canada Virtual Exhibit is a media-rich online version of the Shakespeare–Made in Canada exhibition that was hosted by the Macdonald Stewart Art Centre from January to June 2007. Based on research conducted by the Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project (CASP) at the University of Guelph created by Dr. Daniel Fischlin, the Shakespeare–Made in Canada exhibition was a unique imnitiative sponsoired by the Office of the President at the University of Guelph, and supported by a wide range of community partnerships.

The SMIC Virtual Exhibit offers an in-depth exploration of contemporary Canadian adaptations in theatre, pop media, and visual arts, through a diverse collection of visual media. The Shakespeare–Made in Canada exhibit brought together, for the first time, hundreds of rare artifacts, including the Canadian-owned Sanders portrait, contemporary Canadian theatre designs, Shakespeare in French Canada, First Nations/Aboriginal adaptations of Shakespeare, new Canadian portraiture, a Shakespeare Learning Commons for youth, as well as archival materials from the Canadian Adaptations of Shakespeare Project, the L.W. Conolly Theatre Archives (University of Guelph), and the Stratford Festival of Canada.

To access the Virtual exhibit, click on the following link: http://vsmic.canadianshakespeares.ca/